The UK Smoking Ban

[Meester Pees]

Don't be stupid - Tell me how it's alright to single out smokers when we're all breathing in god knows what kinda crap? Fairly simple question.


And no, the asbestos argument isn't absurd - Once a piece of blue asbestos is broken, all results of safety studies go outta the window.It becomes incredibly toxic.

And no, don't try to say car emissions and smoking emissions are the same thing coz they simply aren't.

-- Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:15 pm --



Why wouldn't they survive? We can handle it without cars - Just coz you're soft and can't well, don't blame me.

Priorities, eh? The world would be improved...Nah, forget it.

did I say just cars?

think before you type, ta.

would the world be improved? exactly.

Backpedal like crazy. Still, at least bikes are environmentally friendly. On Ya Go.

 

[JoeMercer'sWay]

did I say just cars?

think before you type, ta.

would the world be improved? exactly.

Backpedal like crazy. Still, at least bikes are environmentally friendly. On Ya Go.

oh he didn't get it, what a shame.

 

[Meester Pees]

Thick as shit, me. Although I'm sure you can tell.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

What an absurd argument.

It's like saying murder shouldn't be illegal because people are still being murdered.

And show you a single road where cars are not allowed? Happy to once you show me a road where smoking is banned .

Don't be stupid - Tell me how it's alright to single out smokers when we're all breathing in god knows what kinda crap? Fairly simple question.

And no, the asbestos argument isn't absurd - Once a piece of blue asbestos is broken, all results of safety studies go outta the window.It becomes incredibly toxic.

And no, don't try to say car emissions and smoking emissions are the same thing coz they simply aren't.

-- Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:15 pm --

let's ban all fumes and see if your niece and her peers survive for more than a few fucking weeks.

oh, thought not.

.

priorities, you can't get a perfect world, but you can try your best to improve it.

Why wouldn't they survive? We can handle it without cars - Just coz you're soft and can't well, don't blame me.

Priorities, eh? The world would be improved...Nah, forget it.

I have already repeatedly said that smokers are not singled out. The other things you mentioned (asbestos, car fumes) are also subject to legislative controls on their use (as I believe I have already demonstrated) as deemed by parliament as appropriate in the interests of public safety.

 

[JoeMercer'sWay]

Thick as shit, me. Although I'm sure you can tell.

all those evil, nasty, killer fumes...

 

[Meester Pees]

Don't be stupid - Tell me how it's alright to single out smokers when we're all breathing in god knows what kinda crap? Fairly simple question.

And no, the asbestos argument isn't absurd - Once a piece of blue asbestos is broken, all results of safety studies go outta the window.It becomes incredibly toxic.

And no, don't try to say car emissions and smoking emissions are the same thing coz they simply aren't.

-- Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:15 pm --



Why wouldn't they survive? We can handle it without cars - Just coz you're soft and can't well, don't blame me.

Priorities, eh? The world would be improved...Nah, forget it.

I have already repeatedly said that smokers are not singled out. The other things you mentioned (asbestos, car fumes) are also subject to legislative controls on their use (as I believe I have already demonstrated) as deemed by parliament as appropriate in the interests of public safety.

Show me a road on which my niece wouldn't be expected to breathe in fumes. To compare car fumes with cig fumes is ludicrous and you know it.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

I have already repeatedly said that smokers are not singled out. The other things you mentioned (asbestos, car fumes) are also subject to legislative controls on their use (as I believe I have already demonstrated) as deemed by parliament as appropriate in the interests of public safety.

Show me a road on which my niece wouldn't be expected to breathe in fumes. To compare car fumes with cig fumes is ludicrous and you know it.

Which is why they have vastly differing forms of legislation to control their use.

 

[Meester Pees]

Exactly - Smokers are victimised, drivers are not.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Exactly - Smokers are victimised, drivers are not.

I think there might be one or two in the driving lobby who would take issue with that statement.

 

[JoeMercer'sWay]

Exactly - Smokers are victimised, drivers are not.

I think there might be one or two in the driving lobby who would take issue with that statement.

costs a hell of a lot more to drive than smoke, victimised my arse.