Just shoe horning people into any job that comes up to get them off the unemployment stats is plain wrong.
And why is it OK to ask everyone else to pay for them while they turn jobs down?
Just shoe horning people into any job that comes up to get them off the unemployment stats is plain wrong.
But doesn't that depend on whether she can find the right job that fits in with what she is doing which is looking for a job that she is qualified in? The majority of people don't want to be signing on it I have done it at one part in my life many years ago. Just shoe horning people into any job that comes up to get them off the unemployment stats is plain wrong.
And why is it OK to ask everyone else to pay for them while they turn jobs down?
Because its better to pay for them for 6 weeks and them get the right job, the man for 5 weeks and have then back again 3 months down the line.
And you don't really pay for benefits. At least no more than you pay for attack helicopters or corporate tax dodging.
When I was at senior school the numbers were around 5%, personally, I think Blair's 50% is a ridiculous figure,When I graduated about 20% went to university. Now it's about 50%. That's a wonderful thing, but imagining the number of "graduate" jobs has magically increased in the same way is a fantasy.
People compete for jobs. It was ever thus.
When I was at senior school the numbers were around 5%, personally, I think Blair's 50% is a ridiculous figure,
and nobody should expect the taxpayer to fund them in their search for the perfect job, if that job is in an industry
that's massively oversubscribed, or has very limited vacancies.
What about paying them nothing where they get a job fast and then a few months later they then get the job they want?
Why would they come back?
It’s what I did whilst waiting for the “perfect” job for me even though I didn’t particularly enjoy the work nor the hours. But it kept me from ever having to sign on after uni and gave me some measure of financial independence.
Can't agree with this, what you're effectively saying is that whatever you have a degree in, or whatever qualificationBecause it turns out that if you let people starve then they generally turn to crime, it effects the prosperity of their children and the state as a whole becomes overburdened and suffers.
Because they have a job that they aren't suited for and employers aren't stupid.
It isn't plain and wrong.
The state isn't there to cradle you and pay for you whilst you find a cushty job you might fancy. The state is there to help you and support you in finding a job where you can sustain yourself and at that point maybe you can find the job you fancy?
We have all been there and unfortunately the reality of life is no-one gets anywhere without being prepared to work towards it.