Theo Walcott? ..

[The_mace]

Re: Irrelevant Q, but anyway... Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson?

walcott without a doubt! not because i rate him highly but his speed would give us something different that we DO need.

Walcott is shit. I'd hate to see him at City.

AJ is a much better fit for us, look at some of the goals he's scored with both feet. All Walcott is is a hoof and runner.

 

[Cityinmyheart]

Re: Irrelevant Q, but anyway... Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson?

I think Adam Johnson is more consistent.

 

[cmdub]

Re: Irrelevant Q, but anyway... Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson?

I'd have aj over walcott any day for the most part, aj just needs to work and he could be a really good super sub in important league games to give us something different

 

[johnny crossan]

Re: Irrelevant Q, but anyway... Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson?

Walcott is having problems with his contract -- SSN

 

[SWP's back]

Re: Irrelevant Q, but anyway... Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson?

Walcott is having problems with his contract -- SSN

Long words in it?

 

[dref619]

Re: Irrelevant Q, but anyway... Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson?

Walcott so inconsistent out wide because for me he's not a winger, should be played through the middle

 

[ono]

Re: Irrelevant Q, but anyway... Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson?

For a ten who spend 70 mins camped in the oppositions half, Walcott is the opposite of what I'd want if I was Mancini.

 

[Ray78]

Re: Irrelevant Q, but anyway... Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson?

Johnson is technically better, but Walcott has the edge with the British obsession with Pace and Power, AKA headless chicken syndrome.

 

[ono]

Re: Irrelevant Q, but anyway... Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson?

Walcott is having problems with his contract -- SSN

Long words in it?

 

[greasedupdeafguy]

Re: Irrelevant Q, but anyway... Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson?

Walcott his pace would give us something different plus Johnsons been shocking for over a year now.