squirtyflower
Well-Known Member
what was larderland's last reincarnation?cleavers said:
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
This transfer window/Marwood
- Thread starter larderland
- Start date
MSP
Well-Known Member
larderland said:so we sold him for 10mil when we bought him for 7 from the championship and fletcher,a striker who got relegated was bought for 14mil
genius is that marwood
joke
One more time - Fletcher was on peanuts at Wolves and will be on little bit more than peanuts at Sunderland. That gives Sunderland the space to pay bigger transfer fee.
Johsnon was on reportedly 80k wage, I've heard no Real Madrid or Barcelona were after him so City does not have a space to sell him for big transfer fee as Sunderland is not rich enough team to meet that kind of wages.
Why0s that so hard to configure.. it's not only about fees when transfers are being made, wages are as much (if not more) important.
Adebayor would be gone like 2 years ago for 15-20 millions if he was not on huge wages. Same with Bridge, same with RSC. It's not easy to offload City players if big clubs are not after them.
MSP said:larderland said:so we sold him for 10mil when we bought him for 7 from the championship and fletcher,a striker who got relegated was bought for 14mil
genius is that marwood
joke
One more time - Fletcher was on peanuts at Wolves and will be on little bit more than peanuts at Sunderland. That gives Sunderland the space to pay bigger transfer fee.
Johsnon was on reportedly 80k wage, I've heard no Real Madrid or Barcelona were after him so City does not have a space to sell him for big transfer fee as Sunderland is not rich enough team to meet that kind of wages.
Why0s that so hard to configure.. it's not only about fees when transfers are being made, wages are as much (if not more) important.
Adebayor would be gone like 2 years ago for 15-20 millions if he was not on huge wages. Same with Bridge, same with RSC. It's not easy to offload City players if big clubs are not after them.
Adam Johnson: Also was on peanuts Only signed a new five-year lucrative contract (signed by Marwood btw) in January! Why? of course we will struggle to find a buyer and decent fee due to his high wage (approved by Marwood) ....... good job? Right!
Citizen in Pakistan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 Aug 2012
- Messages
- 3,946
because they don't have the in capacities of Marwood,were unfortunately blessed.
Mancini wants to get rid of certain players (Ade, Santa Cruz), club failed, Mancini angry.
Mancini wants to get certain players, they were bloody expensive, club reluctant to spend, Mancini angry.
Mancini angry, Marwood then points out cheaper alternatives to appease Mancini.<br /><br />-- Sat Aug 25, 2012 2:19 pm --<br /><br />
PSG is the one I'm suspect about.
Mancini wants to get certain players, they were bloody expensive, club reluctant to spend, Mancini angry.
Mancini angry, Marwood then points out cheaper alternatives to appease Mancini.<br /><br />-- Sat Aug 25, 2012 2:19 pm --<br /><br />
Chelsea didn't spend as huge as us in previous seasons. And if anything, I believe winning Champions League has alot to do with it.bluethai said:why chelsea and other big spending clubs arn't crazy about ffp like city?
PSG is the one I'm suspect about.
Roll On City
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Mar 2012
- Messages
- 883
FCUK OFF Marwood
Roll On City said:FCUK OFF Marwood
Baby
Blue Haze
Well-Known Member
Roll On City said:FCUK OFF Marwood
At some point, you would think Soriano starts replacing Cook's men with his own.