This transfer window/Marwood

[FantasyIreland]

bump

first we miss out on hazard now we cant even tie up sinclair

marwood you are fantastic....

Can you explain the inside deatils of both these deals as us mere mortals are not privvy to such info,thanks in advance...... Maybe your sidekick CityCTID can also add his valuable and well reasoned input?

Thanks again lads.

 

[moomba]

should be sacked imo

Absolutely.

The truth is, if he could of just wrapped up one of de rossi, RVP or Hazard we would be in a much stronger position... but the fact it's probably going to go down to deadline day over scott fucking sinclair i can understand mancini's frustration.

We will have to pick the trophys we really want to win... not a chance we can compete on all fours...

De Ross didn't want to come, Van Persie and Hazard cost more than what we thought they were worth.

Dancing reportedly agreed with the decision to pass on the latter two.

Do evidently Marwood should be sacked for not being able to magic up club executives so desperate to sell to us that they would sell for millions less than they got elsewhere.

Rightio, nothing like an over-reaction three months after winning the league.

 

[CityCTID]

bump

first we miss out on hazard now we cant even tie up sinclair

marwood you are fantastic....

Can you explain the inside deatils of both these deals as us mere mortals are not privvy to such info,thanks in advance...... Maybe your sidekick CityCTID can also add his valuable and well reasoned input?

Thanks again lads.

Genuine question, are you happy with our transfer dealing to date?

 

[FanchesterCity]

Marwood's job isn't easy, but he doesn't work for Mancini.

If Marwood was told "pay any price, just get them", I'm sure we'd have secured Hazard (maybe not RvP).

But it's not like that is it? Mancini would LIKE the best of the best - what manager wouldn't?
Marwood has to carry out the instructions and vision of the owner, and if that means tightening the reigns, or agreeing the cut off point for a fee with Mancini... then so be it.

I can readily see a situation where (say) Marwood and Mancini identify Hazard and attempt to buy for 25 million, and agree 30 million is their absolute top... then Chelsea offer 32 million. By their own rules, the deal is off.

It's the ONLY way to do business really. You sit down and set out your financial limits before you start seriously shopping. It's all too easy to fall in love with a player / item at the shops and end up making a rash decision... "it's just 2 million more"... "it's just 4 million more"... "it's 5 million plus an agents fee more"...

Before you know it, you've paid 10 million more than you set out to do. Bad business.

 

[grim up north]

bump

first we miss out on hazard now we cant even tie up sinclair

marwood you are fantastic....

Can you explain the inside deatils of both these deals as us mere mortals are not privvy to such info,thanks in advance...... Maybe your sidekick CityCTID can also add his valuable and well reasoned input?

Thanks again lads.

Genuine question, are you happy with our transfer dealing to date?

Did you not learn at school don't answer a question with a question

 

[FanchesterCity]

United didn't get Nasri
United didn't get Hazard

Many City fans didn't want RvP - not that they disliked him, just that he's not a clear improvement over Aguero and Tevez... indeed who IS?

We possibly need to improve defence... and MIGHT have to pay a considerable amount for a defender WHEN a top notch one becomes available.
I don't believe there's any top notch defender on the market at the moment so we might have to be a little patient.

And of course, there's Cavani, and there's De Rossi etc... what IF Cavani did become available for the right price? and we've already tossed off out budget on RvP, or Hazard?

Sometimes. when you have money in your pocket, you don't HAVE to spend it. You wait until there's a player you absolutely must have, and get him.

Some fans seem to be advocating we just look for a marquee signing for the sake of it, and spend whatever it takes to get them.

We already KNOW City could afford to buy Cavani for 60m if they had to.
We already KNOW City could make RvP the highest paid player if they had to.

But we chose not to. Correctly.<br /><br />-- Tue Aug 28, 2012 5:37 pm --<br /><br />Of those seemingly unhappy with our dealings....


Who should we have bought?
and what price should we have paid for them?

 

[Rammy Blue]

I'll wager that Marwood is flirted relatively soon after Soriano takes up office.

 

[FantasyIreland]

Genuine question, are you happy with our transfer dealing to date?

Thats irrelevant to my post.
I want to know the facts behind your lambasting of Marwood,so please enlighten me.

 

[CityCTID]

Can you explain the inside deatils of both these deals as us mere mortals are not privvy to such info,thanks in advance...... Maybe your sidekick CityCTID can also add his valuable and well reasoned input?

Thanks again lads.

Genuine question, are you happy with our transfer dealing to date?

Did you not learn at school don't answer a question with a question

Bore off ;)

 

[Mancio]

35 pages and still waiting for anyone to answer my question :

if we end with nastasic overpayed about 24M and garcia overpayed 25M would you still saying what a good job marwood did ?