This Weekends Other Premiership Games.

44% said:
The thing with united is they are gonna play shit every week but win these games with some luck and be up there to win the title , i have seen it happen all my life , i'm sure it will happen again

So don't delude yourself with any hope that they will not be there again

But i sincerely hope city do it again this year :)

I am under no illusion it is going to be easy and the rags are not to go away. We have just got show some balls and make sure we will finish the job.
 
supercrystal7 said:
hilts said:
supercrystal7 said:
Some people seem to think I am making a knee jerk comment based on RVP getting a hat trick against Southampton. I have called RVP the best player in the league for a while. I have seen him for the last 3 years and he has just been incredible. He literally saved Arsenal so many times. He has done it against the top teams in the biggest games. Anyway we will see over the course of the year. No point going around circles. For me he is the best in the league, for some people here he is not even the best striker in the league and others still not even the best striker at his club.

you can argue he is the best striker in the league no problem and at the moment i would agree but you cant argue he is the best player in the league that doesnt make sense
I don't understand this comment at all. If he is the best striker in the league then who else are you going to say is better overall as a player? The only two candidates are Toure and Silva. So at worst you are saying he might be 3rd, but for me he is the best.

no you daft sod im saying you cant compare toure to rvp because one is a striker the other is a midfielder, who is the best player hart or rvp? you cant say because one is a bleeding goalkeeper, i cant be any clearer if you want to compare then compare like for like

for crying out loud
 
Teams just don't learn that if you adopt the 'what we have, we hold' approach against the rags, they will eventually just overwhelm you.

When teams beat them, it's generally because they get at them, not because they snatch one and then defend for 99 minutes.
 
Blue Tooth said:
LoveCity said:
People who say the rags won't be that lucky in future can't have been following football long? They have no luck quota, it's unending.

93:22

Had nothing to do with luck in their own games.
 
hilts said:
supercrystal7 said:
hilts said:
you can argue he is the best striker in the league no problem and at the moment i would agree but you cant argue he is the best player in the league that doesnt make sense
I don't understand this comment at all. If he is the best striker in the league then who else are you going to say is better overall as a player? The only two candidates are Toure and Silva. So at worst you are saying he might be 3rd, but for me he is the best.

no you daft sod im saying you cant compare toure to rvp because one is a striker the other is a midfielder, who is the best player hart or rvp? you cant say because one is a bleeding goalkeeper, i cant be any clearer if you want to compare then compare like for like

for crying out loud

So true. I'd go as far as to say it's difficult to say who is clearly better even in the same position unless there is a massive difference as they will surely bring different things to your team. It's also pointless and sounds like the old "my dad is bigger than your dad"
 
hilts said:
supercrystal7 said:
hilts said:
you can argue he is the best striker in the league no problem and at the moment i would agree but you cant argue he is the best player in the league that doesnt make sense
I don't understand this comment at all. If he is the best striker in the league then who else are you going to say is better overall as a player? The only two candidates are Toure and Silva. So at worst you are saying he might be 3rd, but for me he is the best.

no you daft sod im saying you cant compare toure to rvp because one is a striker the other is a midfielder, who is the best player hart or rvp? you cant say because one is a bleeding goalkeeper, i cant be any clearer if you want to compare then compare like for like

for crying out loud

No for me that only applies when the players are very close to each other's level. For Toure and RVP I think you can validly make that claim.

However in most circumstances it is not the case. RVP is better than Hart and it is fairly obvious. Messi is better than Toure. Ronaldo is better than Pepe. Or do you have trouble deciding if Lescott is a better player than Silva?
 
supercrystal7 said:
hilts said:
supercrystal7 said:
I don't understand this comment at all. If he is the best striker in the league then who else are you going to say is better overall as a player? The only two candidates are Toure and Silva. So at worst you are saying he might be 3rd, but for me he is the best.

no you daft sod im saying you cant compare toure to rvp because one is a striker the other is a midfielder, who is the best player hart or rvp? you cant say because one is a bleeding goalkeeper, i cant be any clearer if you want to compare then compare like for like

for crying out loud

No for me that only applies when the players are very close to each other's level. For Toure and RVP I think you can validly make that claim.

However in most circumstances it is not the case. RVP is better than Hart and it is fairly obvious. Messi is better than Toure. Ronaldo is better than Pepe. Or do you have trouble deciding if Lescott is a better player than Silva?
Agreed I can't understand why people don't understand this.

That's why I believe in their prime Zidane was better than both Roger Federer and Tiger Woods
 
supercrystal7 said:
hilts said:
supercrystal7 said:
I don't understand this comment at all. If he is the best striker in the league then who else are you going to say is better overall as a player? The only two candidates are Toure and Silva. So at worst you are saying he might be 3rd, but for me he is the best.

no you daft sod im saying you cant compare toure to rvp because one is a striker the other is a midfielder, who is the best player hart or rvp? you cant say because one is a bleeding goalkeeper, i cant be any clearer if you want to compare then compare like for like

for crying out loud

No for me that only applies when the players are very close to each other's level. For Toure and RVP I think you can validly make that claim.

However in most circumstances it is not the case. RVP is better than Hart and it is fairly obvious. Messi is better than Toure. Ronaldo is better than Pepe. Or do you have trouble deciding if Lescott is a better player than Silva?

rvp is better than hart? the only trouble im having is working out if your five cans short of a six pack or are a wum
 
Paulmcfc2703 said:
supercrystal7 said:
hilts said:
no you daft sod im saying you cant compare toure to rvp because one is a striker the other is a midfielder, who is the best player hart or rvp? you cant say because one is a bleeding goalkeeper, i cant be any clearer if you want to compare then compare like for like

for crying out loud

No for me that only applies when the players are very close to each other's level. For Toure and RVP I think you can validly make that claim.

However in most circumstances it is not the case. RVP is better than Hart and it is fairly obvious. Messi is better than Toure. Ronaldo is better than Pepe. Or do you have trouble deciding if Lescott is a better player than Silva?
Agreed I can't understand why people don't understand this.

That's why I believe in their prime Zidane was better than both Roger Federer and Tiger Woods
And Laurel & Hardy were better than Hale and Pace.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.