This Weekends Other Premiership Games.

[supercrystal7]

You can laugh about it, but ultimately it is the truth. Just, because it is very hard to compare players in different positions does not mean it is impossible.

I repeat, who here questions whether Toure is better than Green as a player? Who here if I said it is impossible to compare whether Silva is better than Clyne would agree with me? So we can all agree that when there is a gap even players in different positions can be compared and everyone does so. When the gap is small then it is becomes increasingly difficult to compare the two. It is the same for comparing players across different eras.

At the end of the day RVP is arguably the best striker in the world. Hart is not arguably the best keeper in the world. RVP is without doubt World Class. Hart is not without doubt world class. If you were putting together a 23 players from Earth to face Mars, then RVP would probably be in squad for most people. Hart would not.

I have agreed when the comparison is between the likes of Toure and RVP then the gap is so small that it is hard to compare and the difference in positions makes it near impossible.

 

[hgblue]

You can laugh about it, but ultimately it is the truth. Just, because it is very hard to compare players in different positions does not mean it is impossible.

I repeat, who here questions whether Toure is better than Green as a player? Who here if I said it is impossible to compare whether Silva is better than Clyne would agree with me? So we can all agree that when there is a gap even players in different positions can be compared and everyone does so. When the gap is small then it is becomes increasingly difficult to compare the two. It is the same for comparing players across different eras.

At the end of the day RVP is arguably the best striker in the world. Hart is not arguably the best keeper in the world. RVP is without doubt World Class. Hart is not without doubt world class. If you were putting together a 23 players from Earth to face Mars, then RVP would probably be in squad for most people. Hart would not.

I have agreed when the comparison is between the likes of Toure and RVP then the gap is so small that it is hard to compare and the difference in positions makes it near impossible.

But there's no life on Mars so it wouldn't matter who you picked.

 

[Dave S]

You can laugh about it, but ultimately it is the truth. Just, because it is very hard to compare players in different positions does not mean it is impossible.

I repeat, who here questions whether Toure is better than Green as a player? Who here if I said it is impossible to compare whether Silva is better than Clyne would agree with me? So we can all agree that when there is a gap even players in different positions can be compared and everyone does so. When the gap is small then it is becomes increasingly difficult to compare the two. It is the same for comparing players across different eras.

At the end of the day RVP is arguably the best striker in the world. Hart is not arguably the best keeper in the world. RVP is without doubt World Class. Hart is not without doubt world class. If you were putting together a 23 players from Earth to face Mars, then RVP would probably be in squad for most people. Hart would not.

I have agreed when the comparison is between the likes of Toure and RVP then the gap is so small that it is hard to compare and the difference in positions makes it near impossible.

You are talking utter nonsense.

 

[supercrystal7]

You can laugh about it, but ultimately it is the truth. Just, because it is very hard to compare players in different positions does not mean it is impossible.

I repeat, who here questions whether Toure is better than Green as a player? Who here if I said it is impossible to compare whether Silva is better than Clyne would agree with me? So we can all agree that when there is a gap even players in different positions can be compared and everyone does so. When the gap is small then it is becomes increasingly difficult to compare the two. It is the same for comparing players across different eras.

At the end of the day RVP is arguably the best striker in the world. Hart is not arguably the best keeper in the world. RVP is without doubt World Class. Hart is not without doubt world class. If you were putting together a 23 players from Earth to face Mars, then RVP would probably be in squad for most people. Hart would not.

I have agreed when the comparison is between the likes of Toure and RVP then the gap is so small that it is hard to compare and the difference in positions makes it near impossible.

You are talking utter nonsense.

Cannot be bothered to argue the point. Let it die.

 

[exiled-blue]

RVP wouldn't get anywhere near an earth squad of 32, even if there's no life on Mars

 

[ElanJo]

You can laugh about it, but ultimately it is the truth. Just, because it is very hard to compare players in different positions does not mean it is impossible.

I repeat, who here questions whether Toure is better than Green as a player? Who here if I said it is impossible to compare whether Silva is better than Clyne would agree with me? So we can all agree that when there is a gap even players in different positions can be compared and everyone does so. When the gap is small then it is becomes increasingly difficult to compare the two. It is the same for comparing players across different eras.

At the end of the day RVP is arguably the best striker in the world. Hart is not arguably the best keeper in the world. RVP is without doubt World Class. Hart is not without doubt world class. If you were putting together a 23 players from Earth to face Mars, then RVP would probably be in squad for most people. Hart would not.

I have agreed when the comparison is between the likes of Toure and RVP then the gap is so small that it is hard to compare and the difference in positions makes it near impossible.

You have a point somewhat but the bold is just bollocks

Player A is the best X in the world.
Player B is the 4th best Y in the world.
(According to your logic) therefore Player A is better than Player B

Like I said, bollocks.

 

[samharris]

Anyone who wasnt sure why Mancini wanted Van Persie, there you go. Doesn't need 10 chances to score.

Jesus they were both complete 2 yrd tap ins lol. My gran could have tapped them in. Its not like hes dribbled past 3 defenders and bent it in top corner!!!!

Its only the 3rd game and tbh every team is looking shit atm.

Yet Dzeko can't tap shit to save his life

18 times last season and twice so far this season says he can.

 

[supercrystal7]

You can laugh about it, but ultimately it is the truth. Just, because it is very hard to compare players in different positions does not mean it is impossible.

I repeat, who here questions whether Toure is better than Green as a player? Who here if I said it is impossible to compare whether Silva is better than Clyne would agree with me? So we can all agree that when there is a gap even players in different positions can be compared and everyone does so. When the gap is small then it is becomes increasingly difficult to compare the two. It is the same for comparing players across different eras.

At the end of the day RVP is arguably the best striker in the world. Hart is not arguably the best keeper in the world. RVP is without doubt World Class. Hart is not without doubt world class. If you were putting together a 23 players from Earth to face Mars, then RVP would probably be in squad for most people. Hart would not.

I have agreed when the comparison is between the likes of Toure and RVP then the gap is so small that it is hard to compare and the difference in positions makes it near impossible.

You have a point somewhat but the bold is just bollocks

Player A is the best X in the world.
Player B is the 4th best Y in the world.
(According to your logic) therefore Player A is better than Player B

Like I said, bollocks.

No that's not the only thing I said, but these are indicators. I also said RVP is undoubtedly world class and Hart is not undoubtedly world class, which ultimately is the most important thing. I do agree that for instance the 4th best X is not necessarily better than the 6th best Y.

 

[hilts]

You can laugh about it, but ultimately it is the truth. Just, because it is very hard to compare players in different positions does not mean it is impossible.

I repeat, who here questions whether Toure is better than Green as a player? Who here if I said it is impossible to compare whether Silva is better than Clyne would agree with me? So we can all agree that when there is a gap even players in different positions can be compared and everyone does so. When the gap is small then it is becomes increasingly difficult to compare the two. It is the same for comparing players across different eras.

At the end of the day RVP is arguably the best striker in the world. Hart is not arguably the best keeper in the world. RVP is without doubt World Class. Hart is not without doubt world class. If you were putting together a 23 players from Earth to face Mars, then RVP would probably be in squad for most people. Hart would not.

I have agreed when the comparison is between the likes of Toure and RVP then the gap is so small that it is hard to compare and the difference in positions makes it near impossible.

You have a point somewhat but the bold is just bollocks

Player A is the best X in the world.
Player B is the 4th best Y in the world.
(According to your logic) therefore Player A is better than Player B

Like I said, bollocks.

No that's not the only thing I said, but these are indicators. I also said RVP is undoubtedly world class and Hart is not undoubtedly world class, which ultimately is the most important thing. I do agree that for instance the 4th best X is not necessarily better than the 6th best Y.

so i sold my car on bad fucking maths, cheers




goes to get grifter out of shed

 

[coldnightinstoke]

Is Hart better than Van Persie? Bloody hell this thread took a strange turn