sjk2008 said:
Brilliant. Now the FA can't win.
Let a City player off and they're all corrupt cunts.
Ban a City player and they're all corrupt cunts.
Those clever boys at the FA letting Mario off because the league is 'wrapped up'.
Jesus. If it was so fucking corrupt why dont you do something about it?
Evidence of an apparent meeting between Halsey, O'Neill & Fergie.
Evidence of Lee Mason's apparent 'hate' for City.
I'm sure there's plenty more. Why don't you seek out a pro-City journo on Twitter (there's plenty before you say there aren't any) and provide this 'evidence'.
Surely a journo with such 'evidence' in his hands would be creaming his pants at the possibility of unravelling something major.
Makes me laugh how so many of you can continue to harp on about how corrupt the FA are, churn out the same old 'stories/facts' that apparently back your points up and yet you still proceed to fuck all about it and carry on going to games when you already know it's going to get you anywhere.
Threads like this have RAWK written all fucking over it.
If this was to be true I will hold my hands up and apologise for doubting you for as long as it takes. But I'll sit pretty knowing it's all a load of codswallop.
Once you win the league next season you will all forget about it. Then we'll pop over to Redcafe and see if they create thread after thread on corruption.
Infact, even the most ridiculous football forum on the planet, RAWK, wouldn't churn out such drivel on a daily basis.
Even if there were 'hard' evidence - which i doubt - (they would not be that stupid) do you not realise that it is in no one's interests, least of all journo's, to bite the hand that feeds them, it's known as a vested interest.
So you don't think someone out there would love to unveil such a conspiracy? Someone who would love to have a desk full of evidence to support such a thing. Course they would. There always is
This inherent bias does not need backhanders, or cash exchanging hands its simply an inbuilt bias that is built into the dna of these institutions and that is shown on a matchday, the joke decisions, the favourable draws, the new laws like ffp, homegrown rules etc etc
Favourable draws? Didn't they get drawn City in the 3rd round and then Liverpool in the 4th round this year? Or are we going to go back a few years for this one?
How is that such a difficult concept to grasp? If that were not borne out by the complete disparity in decisions then wecwouldnt have a leg to stand on, but it has in quite dramatic proportions this season.
Football and english football is big business and if you think that the premier league would leave everything to chance then you are naive in the extreme.
Man U are the biggest institution in the premier league, they are burdened by a massive debt that can only be serviced by one thing.....success, without it the rags are in trouble, and a team the size if the rags goibg into administration would be hugely damaging to the premier league, but, they will not let that happen.
Do you really think there isn't some rich as fuck businessman out there who would be willing to buy United if they ever even got close to admin? Really? Come on. Now that is naive.
How is it that the poorest rags team in history who went out of a poor champs league group will likely get a record prem points total. That in itself strikes me as strange, ally that to the favourable decisions and things get very murky.
Because they are a 'team'. Not a collection of brilliant individuals. And before you start, I'm not stating you're nothing like a 'team' as such but there's been a lot of things this season which don't come across well - Tevez saga, Balotelli too often, Barry venting his fury at being subbed after half hour. Dzeko also being pissed off being subbed in Munich. That winning team spirit comes with time and experience and something City will inevitably get soon.
Do you think any of us have any connections to a