Pigeonho said:
schfc6 said:
Your honest opinion is that Robinho, City's top scorer, scoring more league goals than Tevez, Aguero or Dzeko last season is amongst the our worst three signings of all time? You saying you didn't jump out of your seat when we signed him late transfer dealing day? When he scored that free kick of his debut against Chelsea? When he scooped the ball into the net over the advancing keeper against Arsenal? Some of the best moments I can remember.
I'd be willing to bet that Bradbury, Mills, Immel, Lee Peacock, Megson, Heath, Scott Hiley the list is endless never got you off your seat, never made you feel the way Robinho did on occasion.
Am I wrong?
You're looking at it too simple. Of course I was absolutely off the wall bonkers when we signed Robinho, but most people say the same thing - that he was a good signing to announce ourselves. That's all well and good, but I think we would still be where we are now even if we hadn't signed him. He was bought for non-footballing reasons and for £32.5m, he didn't do anywhere near enough on the pitch. Oh, he has the tag of a sub being subbed too. I dare say if you put him in this team he would be much better, which is why I said that rather than being a 'bad' signing, he was more a wrong signing for that time/team.
Are you aware that Robinho scored 14 in 31 games in his first season? He started his second season poorly, but he was nowhere near match fit, rushed back from ankle surgery far too quickly because Hughesless was an idiot.
Far from being the worst signing in our history, you could argue he was the most important signing in the modern era of the club. You say that the other players would have signed for us anyway, but someone had to be the first! Do you think Tevez, Yaya and Silva would have signed because they were desperate to play with Craig Bellamy and Wayne Bridge?!
The day he signed was the first day in my life I actually believed City would win the league again. The whole mood of the club changed, the fans, the media, the general public, and I'm sure the way that other players viewed the club.
You're forgetting how highly rated Robinho was at the time. Certainly more highly rated than Tevez. I remember there was an article in the paper discussing who was better out of him and Ronaldo! Obviously he's not fulfilled his potential, but the point is he helped create a sea-change in the way the club was viewed that has helped us on the road to being one of the most attractive clubs in Europe.
I don't think any of our other signings has quite the same impact in terms of changing people's opinion of the club. I hate the term "marquee signing" as that is not what a football team is about. But the Robinho signing from a strategic point of view was probably the best signing we could have realistically made at the time. And irrespective of all that, in his first season he was an absolute joy to watch.