Top 6 mini league 18/19

[TravisBickle]

Rags stinking the place out lol. Should be a top 5 mini league next season.

 

[lasereyes]

I heard Watford were denied a stonewall today at 0-0. No surprise they opposed VAR for so long.

I saw it on TV - Robertson basically kicked the attacker's leg. Either Moss was bent or so obese he didn't keep up with play (maybe both).

 

[vmsuhail]

Updated

Arsenal 0-2 City
Chelsea 3-2 Arsenal
Rags 0-3 Spurs
Spurs 1-2 Liverpool
Chelsea 1-1 Liverpool
Liverpool 0-0 City
Chelsea 2-2 Rags
Spurs 0-1 City
Arsenal 1-1 Liverpool
City 3 - 1 Rags
Spurs 3 - 1 Chelsea

City - played 4, points 10
Liverpool - played 4, points 6
Spurs - played 4, points 6
Chelsea - played 4, points 5
Arsenal - played 3, points 1
Rags - played 3, points 1

Though they are level on points, and even though Liverpool beat them at home I’d argue Spurs’ results against other top 6 sides are more impressive than Liverpool’s. That win against Chelsea, plus wiping the floor with the rags at the swamp, is to my mind more impressive than Liverpool’s collection of draws in addition to their solitary win at Spurs. I think Chelsea will have better days, but Spurs looked good tonight.

Despite Spurs losing 3 games, they are ahead of Chelsea by 2 points. Top 6 mini league reflecting the standings in the league table.

 

[aguero93:20]

Especially given they went right up the other end and scored (which itself should have been disallowed as Allison took the free kick while the ball was still moving)

Never mind a moving ball, that free kick shouldn't have been allowed to be taken quickly as it gave a disproportionate advantage to Liverpool. Firstly there were still Fulham players who hadn't seen the offside flag go up, secondly, quick free kicks are there to restore an advantage to an attacking side lost due to a cynical foul.

 

[Chi-town blues]

This season mini league will be very important than last season .

 

[Saddleworth2]

This season mini league will be very important than last season .

Whoever wins it will lift the title.

 

[Jordie]

Never mind a moving ball, that free kick shouldn't have been allowed to be taken quickly as it gave a disproportionate advantage to Liverpool. Firstly there were still Fulham players who hadn't seen the offside flag go up, secondly, quick free kicks are there to restore an advantage to an attacking side lost due to a cynical foul.

Quick free kicks are part of the game and are not there to restore anything, not quite sure why you are making rules up.

 

[aguero93:20]

Quick free kicks are part of the game and are not there to restore anything, not quite sure why you are making rules up.

Graham Poll there clearly states that they're for free kicks given for fouls on attacking players. Offside isn't a foul on an attacking player.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/213166-quick-free-kick-whats-the-rule

 

[Jordie]

Sorry mate but I don't care what poll says, there is no rule to determine what quick free kicks are allowed for. That may be his personal interpretation of it but it isn't in the rule book.

 

[aguero93:20]

Sorry mate but I don't care what poll says, there is no rule to determine what quick free kicks are allowed for. That may be his personal interpretation of it but it isn't in the rule book.

You're missing the main point mate, a free kick for offside is an indirect free kick, it's a technical infringement, not a foul. Only a direct free kick can be taken quickly.