Trayvon Martin

[Skashion]

she isn't known for her taste in men that's for sure

Aye, she should turn lesbian if she loves cunts so much.

 

[hilts]

she isn't known for her taste in men that's for sure

Aye, she should turn lesbian if she loves ***** so much.

as long as i can hide in the wardrobe

 

[Skashion]

as long as i can hide in the wardrobe

That's a fetish I've not come across before.

 

[Josh Blue]

she isn't known for her taste in men that's for sure

Aye, she should turn lesbian if she loves ***** so much.

as long as i can hide in the wardrobe

Give up on the jokes pal.

 

[hilts]

Aye, she should turn lesbian if she loves ***** so much.

as long as i can hide in the wardrobe

Give up on the jokes pal.

okay i shall ignore you in future

 

[sweynforkbeard]

Josh Blue (left)

Who's my bird?

If I'm not mistaken that's Arselina Bumhead who was head girl at Buttocks Academy when I was flagellation monitor at St. Hughs Boys Trouserpress College back in the 20s.

 

[Scottyboi]

Not paid much attention to this trial.

Is it basically a Mexican Vigilante who was sick of crime in his area, assuming that a black kid in a hoodie automatically makes him a thief?

So he then apprehends him, ends up getting a beating and shooting the kid in revenge?

 

[Banned Tosspot]

Not paid much attention to this trial.

Is it basically a Mexican Vigilante who was sick of crime in his area, assuming that a black kid in a hoodie automatically makes him a thief?

So he then apprehends him, ends up getting a beating and shooting the kid in revenge?

Pretty much this.

 

[Bigga]

Josh Blue (left)

Who's my bird?

If I'm not mistaken that's Arselina Bumhead who was head girl at Buttocks Academy when I was flagellation monitor at St. Hughs Boys Trouserpress College back in the 20s.

I really love these moments...

 

[ElanJo]

First question would have been why did he feel compelled to follow and then chase down Mr. Martin. His previous statements are rather all over the place and boil down to he chased him because he looked suspicious. When asked why Mr. Martin looked suspicious, his response was because he was Black.

Then the opposing lawyer would ask him why he started a fight with someone simply walking down the street. He would try to lie of course, but whenever interviewed he's come across poorly.

Because he's a racist. Let's keep that in mind.

So yes, he would have slit his own wrists by testifying. Constitutionally, he can't be compelled to incriminate himself.

This is why a potential civil suit is intriguing. He would be compelled to testify twice. First when he attempts to invoke Stand Your Ground, he must testify to a judge. If he goofs that up, and as he is a habitual loser, so that's very likely, Stand Your Ground is denied. Then he goes to civil trial, which unlike a criminal trial does not need a unanimous decision. They also aren't restricted to reasonable doubt. All the jury has to do is decide what they think happened and act accordingly.

And since he's a racist, he'll probably get destroyed on the stand and lose.

Words fail...

You're welcome to present a cogent counter-argument. I'll wait.

And most of the protesting seems to be of a non-violent nature. I'm sure that's quite disappointing to some.

Well, "When asked why Mr. Martin looked suspicious, his response was because he was Black." is not true.

 

[mackenzie]

Not paid much attention to this trial.

Is it basically a Mexican Vigilante who was sick of crime in his area, assuming that a black kid in a hoodie automatically makes him a thief?

So he then apprehends him, ends up getting a beating and shooting the kid in revenge?

Yep.
And then gets acquitted. Don't you just love America.

 

[i kne albert davy]

Words fail...

You're welcome to present a cogent counter-argument. I'll wait.

And most of the protesting seems to be of a non-violent nature. I'm sure that's quite disappointing to some.

Well, "When asked why Mr. Martin looked suspicious, his response was because he was Black." is not true.

Of course its not true but as he has no idea what the truth is its as well to just make something up that he wants to believe. lets see if any evidence of him saying this shows up.

 

[Josh Blue]

Not paid much attention to this trial.

Is it basically a Mexican Vigilante who was sick of crime in his area, assuming that a black kid in a hoodie automatically makes him a thief?

So he then apprehends him, ends up getting a beating and shooting the kid in revenge?

Yep.
And then gets acquitted. Don't you just love America.

Well there was no Mexican involved in anything.

 

[mackenzie]

Not paid much attention to this trial.

Is it basically a Mexican Vigilante who was sick of crime in his area, assuming that a black kid in a hoodie automatically makes him a thief?

So he then apprehends him, ends up getting a beating and shooting the kid in revenge?

Yep.
And then gets acquitted. Don't you just love America.

Well there was no Mexican involved in anything.

Ok then, just a vigilante.

 

[i kne albert davy]

Not paid much attention to this trial.

Is it basically a Mexican Vigilante who was sick of crime in his area, assuming that a black kid in a hoodie automatically makes him a thief?

So he then apprehends him, ends up getting a beating and shooting the kid in revenge?

Yep.
And then gets acquitted. Don't you just love America.

Well there was no Mexican involved in anything.

Part Peruvian Indian part white then

 

[ElanJo]

Not paid much attention to this trial.

Is it basically a Mexican Vigilante who was sick of crime in his area, assuming that a black kid in a hoodie automatically makes him a thief?

So he then apprehends him, ends up getting a beating and shooting the kid in revenge?

That's the verdict of people who have also not paid much attention to the trial.

 

[mackenzie]

Not paid much attention to this trial.

Is it basically a Mexican Vigilante who was sick of crime in his area, assuming that a black kid in a hoodie automatically makes him a thief?

So he then apprehends him, ends up getting a beating and shooting the kid in revenge?

That's the verdict of people who have also not paid much attention to the trial.

I've not paid much attention to the trial I admit. However, one thing seems resoundingly clear; that if Zimmerman had not been so vigilante in going after this lad then the lad would still be alive.

 

[sweynforkbeard]

Hell, there's varmints outside Diamond Lil's bothering the mules - pauses to turn sideways and spit copiously into a large spittoon - are we gonna raise a possee or are yer all yeller?

 

[Josh Blue]

Yep.
And then gets acquitted. Don't you just love America.

Well there was no Mexican involved in anything.

Part Peruvian Indian part white then

Sorry was I picking hairs?

 

[hilts]

Not paid much attention to this trial.

Is it basically a Mexican Vigilante who was sick of crime in his area, assuming that a black kid in a hoodie automatically makes him a thief?

So he then apprehends him, ends up getting a beating and shooting the kid in revenge?

That's the verdict of people who have also not paid much attention to the trial.

I've not paid much attention to the trial I admit. However, one thing seems resoundingly clear; that if Zimmerman had not been so vigilante in going after this lad then the lad would still be alive.

if martin was right or wrong following the kid is not relevant in terms of convicting him of murder though is it