Bigga said:
dazdon said:
Hispanics are as persecuted in the US as black people are....hispanics are on the cusp of being recognised as a race.
<a class="postlink" href="http://nbclatino.com/2013/01/04/census-might-make-hispanic-a-race/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://nbclatino.com/2013/01/04/census- ... ic-a-race/</a>
Zimmerman isn't white by that definition he is Hispanic.
Question; why are YOU using race as an argument??
Just taking the race issue aside, are you
advocating that it is alright to kill a person that is unarmed, with a firearm, cos you are
losing a fight you really started??
Pathetic and side stepping is your whole 'reasoning'.
1. There is nothing inherently wrong about killing an unarmed person with a firearm. This is obvious. To illustrate, just imagine that you're in the process of being pushed off a cliff by an unarmed person.
So saying things along the lines of 'A was armed and B was unarmed!' is, on its face, not an argument for anything
2. If I just walked up to you and twatted you in the face and you reacted by escalating the confrontation to the point I had a reasonable fear of impending death or serious bodily harm, let's say you whipped out a chainsaw and swung it towards my neck, I don't think any sane person would say that I'd not be justified in shooting you.
3. In this particular case, there is no evidence to suggest Zimmerman started the fight - not that it even matters all that much since what really matters is what was occurring just before the shot.
On a side note, still seeing people talk about Stand Your Ground. This case was not SYG. This case surrounded classical self defense, given that Trayvon was straddled on top of Zimmerman - giving him no possible way of retreating.