Trayvon Martin

[Bigga]

Finally you've spat it out.

WTF is a Zimmerman sympathiser you complete tool?

Go and give that Beano another read you banal thinking idiot.

BJ you're silly.

Ignore the K-K-Clown, Josh.

He doesn't do complex psychological questions like the one I asked that he ignores. He can't comprehend a situation about two guys where he can't attach a race. It's too much for him.

He's goes into overload!

Another insinuation about my perceived racism.

You think that's a slur Bigga?

No wonder you get your whiney arse haded to you time and time again on here.

Oh look...here comes Bigga playing the race card again.

How complex is that :-)

Wow, is it me or did you assume I wrote KKK instead of K-K-Clown?? Pretty sure the lettering different and not remotely the same...

Throughout this thread I have been mentioning about an unarmed kid against an armed man as my mainstay point. Other people have mentioned race and I have given out information. You like to perceive an assumption of myself that has long since been crushed in other threads, but you have yet to catch up.

And when YOU have the IQ necessary to 'hand me my arse', I will quit BM, for quite some time. I will answer questions and not leave myself open to be shot down. IF that happens, I take it like a man.

Unlike some, namely yourself.

 

[taconinja]

The point is very simple, josh is insinuating that anyone not perturbed by the verdict is racist.

Or why would he mention it in the same breath as the EDL?

Very very simple and straightforward to understand.

-- Sun Jul 14, 2013 11:31 pm --


See above.

You should note that Zimmerman hasn't been found innocent. He was found not guilty.

I shouldn't need to note it as I never called him innocent, I said he was acquitted.

Nice try though.

*sigh* I pointed it out for clarity. Quit being overly sensitive.

 

[hilts]

Ignore the K-K-Clown, Josh.

He doesn't do complex psychological questions like the one I asked that he ignores. He can't comprehend a situation about two guys where he can't attach a race. It's too much for him.

He's goes into overload!

Another insinuation about my perceived racism.

You think that's a slur Bigga?

No wonder you get your whiney arse haded to you time and time again on here.

Oh look...here comes Bigga playing the race card again.

How complex is that :-)

Wow, is it me or did you assume I wrote KKK instead of K-K-Clown?? Pretty sure the lettering different and not remotely the same...

Throughout this thread I have been mentioning about an unarmed kid against an armed man as my mainstay point. Other people have mentioned race and I have given out information. You like to perceive an assumption of myself that has long since been crushed in other threads, but you have yet to catch up.

And when YOU have the IQ necessary to 'hand me my arse', I will quit BM, for quite some time. I will answer questions and not leave myself open to be shot down. IF that happens, I take it like a man.

Unlike some, namely yourself.

what does the k k in k k clown mean?

 

[SWP's back]

You should note that Zimmerman hasn't been found innocent. He was found not guilty.

I shouldn't need to note it as I never called him innocent, I said he was acquitted.

Nice try though.

*sigh* I pointed it out for clarity. Quit being overly sensitive.

But my point still stands to josh. He inferred trusting the verdict is tantamount to racism.

I speak only as a devils advocate as haven't followed the case as closely as everyone else it seems.

 

[taconinja]

The point is very simple, josh is insinuating that anyone not perturbed by the verdict is racist.

Or why would he mention it in the same breath as the EDL?

Very very simple and straightforward to understand.

-- Sun Jul 14, 2013 11:31 pm --


See above.

You should note that Zimmerman hasn't been found innocent. He was found not guilty.

???????????????????????????????????

It leaves him open to federal prosecution (unlikely but possible) for hate crimes and a civil suit where unlike a criminal trial, he would be compelled to testify. That likely wouldn't go well for him. His best shot for civil immunity is invoking Stand Your Ground, but that also requires his testimony. Again that's something he likely wants to avoid doing.

 

[dazdon]

Ohh so you always abide by the word of the court in foreign countries do you? Or are you a hypocrite? Abide when it suits I suppose.

What the hell are you going on about?

If this is the case what the fuck has this got to do with you?

Feathers ruffled fella?

<a class="postlink" href="http://dailycaller.com/2012/05/29/report-six-pakistanis-sentenced-to-death-for-dancing-singing-at-wedding/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://dailycaller.com/2012/05/29/repor ... t-wedding/</a>

The law is the law I suppose so I guess they are guilty.

Are you drunk?

Why are you calling people who believe in the law racists and EDL sympathisers?

What is a Zimmerman sympathiser in particular?

 

[Bluedancer]

What's happening to this thread/debate

* holds head in hands*

 

[dazdon]

what does the k k in k k clown mean?

He's inferring that i'm a racist.

He is in fact playing the race card.

 

[taconinja]

I shouldn't need to note it as I never called him innocent, I said he was acquitted.

Nice try though.

*sigh* I pointed it out for clarity. Quit being overly sensitive.

But my point still stands to josh. He inferred trusting the verdict is tantamount to racism.

I speak only as a devils advocate as haven't followed the case as closely as everyone else it seems.

Understood. I think is is only beginning as far as legal proceedings and a lot of people are going to be asking how he can be sued when he was acquitted.

 

[SWP's back]

Another insinuation about my perceived racism.

You think that's a slur Bigga?

No wonder you get your whiney arse haded to you time and time again on here.

Oh look...here comes Bigga playing the race card again.

How complex is that :-)

Wow, is it me or did you assume I wrote KKK instead of K-K-Clown?? Pretty sure the lettering different and not remotely the same...

Throughout this thread I have been mentioning about an unarmed kid against an armed man as my mainstay point. Other people have mentioned race and I have given out information. You like to perceive an assumption of myself that has long since been crushed in other threads, but you have yet to catch up.

And when YOU have the IQ necessary to 'hand me my arse', I will quit BM, for quite some time. I will answer questions and not leave myself open to be shot down. IF that happens, I take it like a man.

Unlike some, namely yourself.

what does the k k in k k clown mean?

We all know what it means and he knows we are stupid enough to fall for his rewriting of its meaning or it would be C-C-Clown

 

[Josh Blue]

What the hell are you going on about?

If this is the case what the fuck has this got to do with you?

Feathers ruffled fella?

<a class="postlink" href="http://dailycaller.com/2012/05/29/report-six-pakistanis-sentenced-to-death-for-dancing-singing-at-wedding/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://dailycaller.com/2012/05/29/repor ... t-wedding/</a>

The law is the law I suppose so I guess they are guilty.

Are you drunk?

Why are you calling people who believe in the law racists and EDL sympathisers?

What is a Zimmerman sympathiser in particular?

I'm calling you personally an EDL sympathiser after your comments on past threads.

As for the rest just try and engage your ostrich brain.

 

[hilts]

You should note that Zimmerman hasn't been found innocent. He was found not guilty.

???????????????????????????????????

It leaves him open to federal prosecution (unlikely but possible) for hate crimes and a civil suit where unlike a criminal trial, he would be compelled to testify. That likely wouldn't go well for him. His best shot for civil immunity is invoking Stand Your Ground, but that also requires his testimony. Again that's something he likely wants to avoid doing.

Is this an american thing? i always thought a juror gives a verdict of guilty or not guilty, never heard anyone judged as found innocent

 

[SWP's back]

*sigh* I pointed it out for clarity. Quit being overly sensitive.

But my point still stands to josh. He inferred trusting the verdict is tantamount to racism.

I speak only as a devils advocate as haven't followed the case as closely as everyone else it seems.

Understood. I think is is only beginning as far as legal proceedings and a lot of people are going to be asking how he can be sued when he was acquitted.

A la OJ who was?

 

[dazdon]

I'm calling you personally an EDL sympathiser after your comments on past threads.

As for the rest just try and engage your ostrich brain.

Well you're a fool then aren't you...you show me where I have engaged in a thread where I have shown loyalty to the EDL?

Yourself and Bigga deserve each other and you're both vile.

No wonder you're both bullied and ridiculed.

 

[mrcunny]

Wow, is it me or did you assume I wrote KKK instead of K-K-Clown?? Pretty sure the lettering different and not remotely the same...

Throughout this thread I have been mentioning about an unarmed kid against an armed man as my mainstay point. Other people have mentioned race and I have given out information. You like to perceive an assumption of myself that has long since been crushed in other threads, but you have yet to catch up.

And when YOU have the IQ necessary to 'hand me my arse', I will quit BM, for quite some time. I will answer questions and not leave myself open to be shot down. IF that happens, I take it like a man.

Unlike some, namely yourself.

what does the k k in k k clown mean?

We all know what it means and he knows we are stupid enough to fall for his rewriting of its meaning or it would be C-C-Clown

 

[Bigga]

So, Steven Lawrence was murdered because of his racial profile. It took YEARS for this to come to court cos the police said there was a lack of evidence, despite the witnesses and the bragging of the murderers. Eventually, after many attempts they are found guilty and yet the Lawrence family are made victims of police profiling. An admittance from the former chief of police under that jurisdiction.

Why is the Steven Lawrence case so special...?? Hm, I dunno...

So hes special how? What makes you think that the police dont use these tactics on all murder victims?
Apparently one of the men doing time for his murder is actually innocent by all accounts.
Lawrence was killed because he strayed into the wrong area after being told.
A few others folks have been killed for straying in the wrong areas its been going on for years,but a lot of these cases get pushed under the carpet and never heard on again..So im going to ask you the same question again.Why is lawrence so special?..

Don't all racist murders get reported? Murdered for going into 'the wrong area' is 'normal' is it?

I'm glad to know that the police tend to profile all victim's families years after the event.


Your silly point is like saying 'why have Mothers against Guns formed a group when people have been shot for years? You're basically saying no one should make a stand.

Wow.
Really good to know.

You are saying that not me.,I just asked you 1 simple question which you find hard to answer.I just stated a few facts to you for you then to behave like a spoilt brat.
tangent springs to mind here..

The mothers against gun crime can you tell me any of the victims names or their mothers? Without googling the fooker up..

I can tell you for nothing that all victims families get profiled..

So the question is why is lawrence so special? and why isnt any of the mothers against gun crime who have their child murdered not managed to have a knighthood..so the 2nd question is why is mrs lawrence so special..

All victim's families get profiled for, say, 20 years? Interesting.

And yes, I do know one or two gun victim families. None of whom's names I care to share with you or the board. I told one of the victims he 'would be dead before long' that way he was carrying on.

If you have to ask why the Lawrence case is still in the news 20 years on, you seriously need to ask yourself why as I have answered your question as simply as I can.

Hasn't Zimmerman's case been thrown out now and him acquitted?

What's your point?

Has discussion and free will to question a verdict been banned on Bluemoon now? Isn't this the point of the forum; to discuss??

The point is very simple, josh is insinuating that anyone not perturbed by the verdict is racist.

Or why would he mention it in the same breath as the EDL?

Very very simple and straightforward to understand.

Not so. You framed an open question with no leanings, but only to your own understanding of why you framed the question as you did. So not "very very simple", nor "straightforward to understand at all".

Secondly, your absorption of Josh's posts are different to mine and I don't get what you have gleaned in the remotest sense.

 

[Josh Blue]

I'm calling you personally an EDL sympathiser after your comments on past threads.

As for the rest just try and engage your ostrich brain.

Well you're a fool then aren't you...you show me where I have engaged in a thread where I have shown loyalty to the EDL?

Yourself and Bigga deserve each other and you're both vile.

No wonder you're both bullied and ridiculed.

1)Dafuq
2)Sorry Dazdon I must be mistaken, sincerest apologies.
3)I'm going to sleep.

 

[taconinja]

???????????????????????????????????

It leaves him open to federal prosecution (unlikely but possible) for hate crimes and a civil suit where unlike a criminal trial, he would be compelled to testify. That likely wouldn't go well for him. His best shot for civil immunity is invoking Stand Your Ground, but that also requires his testimony. Again that's something he likely wants to avoid doing.

Is this an american thing? i always thought a juror gives a verdict of guilty or not guilty, never heard anyone judged as found innocent

Don't know if it's American per se, but we generally refer to that instance as the case being dismissed with prejudice. It does happen.

 

[SWP's back]

Don't all racist murders get reported? Murdered for going into 'the wrong area' is 'normal' is it?

I'm glad to know that the police tend to profile all victim's families years after the event.


Your silly point is like saying 'why have Mothers against Guns formed a group when people have been shot for years? You're basically saying no one should make a stand.

Wow.
Really good to know.

You are saying that not me.,I just asked you 1 simple question which you find hard to answer.I just stated a few facts to you for you then to behave like a spoilt brat.
tangent springs to mind here..

The mothers against gun crime can you tell me any of the victims names or their mothers? Without googling the fooker up..

I can tell you for nothing that all victims families get profiled..

So the question is why is lawrence so special? and why isnt any of the mothers against gun crime who have their child murdered not managed to have a knighthood..so the 2nd question is why is mrs lawrence so special..

All victim's families get profiled for, say, 20 years? Interesting.

And yes, I do know one or two gun victim families. None of whom's names I care to share with you or the board. I told one of the victims he 'would be dead before long' that way he was carrying on.

If you have to ask why the Lawrence case is still in the news 20 years on, you seriously need to ask yourself why as I have answered your question as simply as I can.

What's your point?

Has discussion and free will to question a verdict been banned on Bluemoon now? Isn't this the point of the forum; to discuss??

The point is very simple, josh is insinuating that anyone not perturbed by the verdict is racist.

Or why would he mention it in the same breath as the EDL?

Very very simple and straightforward to understand.

Not so. You framed an open question with no leanings, but only to your own understanding of why you framed the question as you did. So not "very very simple", nor "straightforward to understand at all".

Secondly, your absorption of Josh's posts are different to mine and I don't get what you have gleaned in the remotest sense.

I really couldn't give a toss. I do not find engaging you fulfilling. Other people understood Josh's inference and converting you is of no interest to me what so ever.

Hope this helps and it's not intended as an attack, we shall never see eye to eye on most things, possibly as you're about 5' 8"

 

[Bigga]

Wow, is it me or did you assume I wrote KKK instead of K-K-Clown?? Pretty sure the lettering different and not remotely the same...

Throughout this thread I have been mentioning about an unarmed kid against an armed man as my mainstay point. Other people have mentioned race and I have given out information. You like to perceive an assumption of myself that has long since been crushed in other threads, but you have yet to catch up.

And when YOU have the IQ necessary to 'hand me my arse', I will quit BM, for quite some time. I will answer questions and not leave myself open to be shot down. IF that happens, I take it like a man.

Unlike some, namely yourself.

what does the k k in k k clown mean?

We all know what it means and he knows we are stupid enough to fall for his rewriting of its meaning or it would be C-C-Clown

Finger stammer/ slip of the keys/ whatever you like...