Cobwebcat
Well-Known Member
tonea2003 said:tolmie's hairdoo said:Damocles said:To pass FFP, we are talking margins of 10m being deal breakers. We are sailing that close to the edge.
Our big winner is that they discount some wages signed before 2010. I say two years not because of compensation but because it will get us out of the first Monitoring Period and presuming we continue commercial growth, we can afford to sack him.
I cannot see any possible way we can sign big in January unless we sell a big player.
In regards to the CL finances, if we sacked Mancini and his staff, brought in a new manager and his staff and could do so in under 20m then it could be done. But if this new manager doesn't go to the semis or later, we're buggered financially.
I don't see the rush if I'm honest. It's safer to wait two years which also will help our coefficient and get easier groups, than needlessly gamble away the financial or competition sanctions. We should be thinking about a period of consolidation to align our finances with other clubs and FFP.
The first MP we should be ok, it's the second one which I'm concerned abouit.
Sorry pal, you are well wide of the mark on this one.
You are essentially stating our owners are prepared to to sit on their hands for the next two years at least, regardless of results on the field, in lip-service to FFPR.
I'm sure they have been prudent enough to include various caveats in Bobby's contract, otherwise why offer him five years, why not four, or three?
It's a contradiction in terms to suggest our owners are long-term thinkers because they believe Bobby is the right man in charge, yet not accommodate future bumps in the road.
As for our financial figures, a couple more weeks, and we'll all get to see what they look like.
I also expect the January window to enlighten a lot more people as to the new direction we will be taking.
have you something to tell us :-)
Steady ;-)