walker_is_faster
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 May 2015
- Messages
- 1,147
Terrible deal
Terrible deal
We payed more to sign him, now selling him for less,we could easy sell him for over 20mil. but it is better to put clause for loan young player who can improve and cost more then than clause also if there is no sell on clause in this deal,then it is even worse deal. Let's see if we want someone from them what price will be?Why? We can book the 8.5million now and if we decide he's improved enough, it will only cost us 20mill to bring him back.
Definitely need Gundo to stay, he is true class and he works like a trojan, very often unnoticed. Mahrez we should keep. Sterling on the other hand, we should get the best we can for him, if thats a bag of spuds and two tins of beans then so be it.Cant see any club paying a big fee and matching the present wages of Sterling or Mahrez. They will run their contracts down imo.
I don't want Gundo to leave.
What if it’s a bag of spuds and 2 tins of carrots..Definitely need Gundo to stay, he is true class and he works like a trojan, very often unnoticed. Mahrez we should keep. Sterling on the other hand, we should get the best we can for him, if thats a bag of spuds and two tins of beans then so be it.
We paid a reported £11.8mill 3 years ago, that leaves £4.3mill book value on him(?). We would have had loan fees too, don't forget.We payed more to sign him, now selling him for less,we could easy sell him for over 20mil. but it is better to put clause for loan young player who can improve and cost more then than clause also if there is no sell on clause in this deal,then it is even worse deal. Let's see if we want someone from them what price will be?
That'll do.What if it’s a bag of spuds and 2 tins of carrots..