Onholiday(somemightsay)
Well-Known Member
Good on him - has generally been consistent in his challenges of most boxers..........Yeah watched it yesterday. He's come out with some right bullshit Fury and glad hes being called out for it.
Good on him - has generally been consistent in his challenges of most boxers..........Yeah watched it yesterday. He's come out with some right bullshit Fury and glad hes being called out for it.
It's all in the interpretation I suppose. The judges don't have the luxury of watching a replay which makes the decision all the more baffling. Now if it was a championship fight the verdict would be less controversial as it's generally accepted the challenger needs to take the crown off the holder convincingly.Ok boss. You’ve given Ngannu the first. Fury landed 11 (44%) to his 6 (26%).
You’ve also said 9th was level where he only landed 2 shots to Fury’s 8.
That swing gives it Fury on your card. I can totally see the argument for Ngannu winning but how they score it I thought Fury just did enough. It certainly wasn’t the robbery people are suggesting but agree it falls into contentious decision of which a split verdict will always be.
Don't know what was the worst.
The 30 minute pre bout show or the actual 30 minutes of Boxing.
First they’ll announce a delay to 23 December, then there will be an argument about the new date, then the delay will question whether it will happen in Saudi - taking the money off the table - by which time Fury will be doing his finished with boxing routine, and we’ll be in the spring before we know it and Usyk will just move on.
Cynical I know but probably not far off it.
Have a feeling the usyk fight doesn’t happen and fury walks away from boxing .
Tigers own lions alsoBear and Lions were pitched against each other in North America by gold rush prospectors, but the bears won due to lions having thin skulls.