christened at st marks
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 5,263
He'll just block you, I'm speaking from experience.You should call him out on Twitter and expose him for his blatant hypocrisy. I'm going to.
Liew is a Liverpool fan so no surprises he's talking shite and going over the top.
Jonathan Liew swallowed a thesaurus and spat out big, aggressive-sounding words at random. His article is a rhetorical pile of puke.This an extract from that pathetic article. What a vile bigot
"
Trawl the City messageboards in the wake of Uefa’s decision to ban the club from the Champions League for two seasons, and it won’t take you long to stumble across the rhetoric of scorched earth: of traitors and revolutionaries, violence and purgation, shady cartels and subhuman scum. "
Our owner will not take anything but a win?
We are now all or nothing surely?
1. Being deceitful isn't always 'a worse offence than the offence itself': it's in most jurisdictions (according to sentencing guidelines) far less serious than the original offence itself and results in much fewer prosecutions. Even in the UK, if I turned up at the Guardian's offices and slapped David Conn's bald head but then denied it, the only prosecution I'd face is one for the (common) assault.
2. More importantly, nowhere in the 'UEFA Club Licensing and Financial Fair Play Regulations' or 'the Procedural rules governing the UEFA Club Financial Control Body' does it say that:
- 'Breach of trust' is an offence
- 'Breach of trust' or a similar offence is more serious than any other offence
Once again, it looks like Conn's arrived at an opinion not just without facts but in the opposition of facts.
He really is a disgrace to journalism.
Up to CAS. I'd imagine that they'd suspend the ban. If they're taking their time to process the case they're taking it very seriously so a suspension would be necessary.If CAS can't process the case by this summer, are we still banned next season or does it automatically get suspended?