MillionMilesAway
Well-Known Member
It is ridiculous, isn't it?
So the AP claims such are the levels of secrecy, they don't even know where the case will be tried from remotely, but drops the staggering exclusive it will probably be from London and Switzerland?
And to really push the levels of secrecy over the top, nobody knows the names of the CAS judges involved.
Amazing stuff. Which begs the question, if it is so secret how the fuck do AP know anything concerning the hearing.
Making it up as they go along these twats. I wait with bated breath what the Sundays will reliably inform us tomorrow.
I'm going for an even greater emphasis on City getting away with it, some bullshit last twist to influence the public narrative.
Isn't that just a matter of AP having asked and been told it's not being revealed?
I don't see a problem with it - 'location' is meaningless anyway, if some is being done by video conference, and it may just mean that which hotel (etc) is being used is not being revealed.
I suspect they're just trying to avoid a media scrum or, worse, nutjob fan action, including social media, etc.
Both sides will know who the judges are, it will almost certainly be in the CAS report on the case, and it makes no difference who else knows right now.