UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
I can picture it now. We go in on Manday quite confident but we're struggling. Pannick and the other QC, Paul Harris, aren't really firing on all cylinders and UEFA's team are defending for their lives but just before lunch on the Tuesday, they land a key blow and we're in the driving seat. Everything looks like it's falling into place for the second half of the hearing but their QC makes a great point when one of our guys gets things a bit wrong and concedes an easy point soon after lunch. Things get a bit tetchy from then and one of their lawyers gets a bit too excited and has to be sent out of the meeting.

Things look good for us but somehow Pannick nad Harris let their guard down and UEFA get their noses in front. That affects them and they can't do anything right from there on. It gets to just before 5pm on the Wednesday and UEFA look safe for the win but Harris makes a great point and it's in the balance. Pannick walks to the back of the room and gives a piece of paper to one of his support team, who digs in a file and gives him one back. Then Pannick puts the killer point to the panel as the clock ticks towrds 5. The judges look at each other and nod and case thrown out thanks to Pannicks's last minute intervention.
Thats just plain fantasy stuff.
 
I am just trying to lay out his current record .

He won the prorogation case because the SC was biased in his favour.

On a level playing field , he lost.
With our funds we can afford any lawyer we want. We’ve gone for the best money can buy. But in your head are owners are that stupid they’ve picked a serial loser to represent us. I suggest you give your head a serious wobble and have a rethink
 
Not Bollocks , just the truth .

if you study the case and drop the bullshit the case hung on the dire performance of Lord Keen - no conspiracy, no corruption just the Advocate General for Scotland put in a howler of a performance and Lord Pannick had a field day.
 
I am just trying to lay out his current record .

He won the prorogation case because the SC was biased in his favour.

On a level playing field , he lost.
Have you ever thought it might be about the evidence not just the people. Yes you buy the best to put your case forward but fundamentally you need ammunition.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.