UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

[blueyorkie]

Don't think so if the original case was brought within the five year limit?

With respect the case had to be brought within 5 years of the alleged breach, as per UEFA regulations, they missed that!

 

[DrBlueBob]

*gulps - I'm just a cook.

That's one for the teenagers Tolm.

 

[Dirty Harry]

Settlements generally are not an admission of the breach or "guilt". In fact they usually specifically say the exact opposite - ie that the parties don't accept any breaches actually took place.

Similar to Liverpool hacking our scouting base and paying 1 million dollars ?

 

[ganganvince]

*gulps - I'm just a cook.

 

[Sir peace frog]

*gulps - I'm just a cook.

nope cant do it ,was going to edit it,but i cant :)

 

[blueyorkie]

It may cut it dead but only having considered all of the case. They won't stop it half way through and say "I agree, case closed"

Thank you

 

[toffee balls]

Even though Khaldoon said we wouldn't do it again you could see a Pinch MK2 coming out of this. Obviously it would have to have no ban whatsoever but if it was a small financial penalty and a don't make it look like you are trying to get round the rules in future type of thing.

Not a chance.
We were swizzled once by the representatives of the G14 cartel , not again.

 

[Jam Tomorrow]

You never know this time tomorrow evening we may be reading the headline “ Man City ban sensationally overturned as CAS through case out on day one of hearing due to UEFAs failure to present credible evidence of wrong doing”. And a footnote “Man City to sue corrupt bastards for unlimited damages”.

 

[slbsn]

Similar to Liverpool hacking our scouting base and paying 1 million dollars ?

Yes. I'd put big money on there being a clause that says words to the effect "Nothing in this Agreement or any related document shall be construed as constituting an admission of any liability or wrongdoing whatsoever by either of the Parties or be admissible in any proceedings as evidence of liability or wrongdoing by either of the Parties." It may also say: "The Parties acknowledge and agree that there is a possibility that, after settling this matter, it will discover facts which were unknown or unsuspected at the time, and which if known by such Party at the time of this settlement might have materially affected its decision to settle this matter and the Parties are assuming any risk of such unknown facts and such unknown and unsuspected claims"

 

[City Man]

Dark forces involved here, have a feeling it will be upheld because what we are against however, when it does I think we will unleash hell. Its a long game.

It is a serious mistake to think that somehow the CAS are part of any dark forces. If the CAS decision goes in any way against us , then there will be a plethora of posts on here about the CAS being bent. So if you're inclined to think that may be the case then Google the CAS list (panel) of people and their CVs then ask yourself honestly if these people will do anything other than judge the matter objectively. In fact, I'm surprised given the Cvs of these people they can stoop so low as to be on a sports arbitration court. But I imagine they do it because they think sport is important. They are definitely not short of a bob or two.