UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
People are vastly underestimating the process of preparing a statement in response to an issue of this magnitude.

Not really the first statement can be the usually response and pretty basic with at the end have we will make a further statement later.
 
Easy if you are guilty, but we have made very, very strong public noises we are innocent. If our appeal is rejected our CEO and god forbid Chairman are in a difficult position.
Look at it the other satisfying way if we are exonerated, the media and lots of journalists will be in their own difficult position. Now thats a nice thought for the weekend.
 
should lock the thread until we know the answers.

Too much what ifs etc

Bluemoon is a discussion forum - it stands to follow that people are discussing the CAS hearing in here, as the thread title indicates.

This isn’t supposed to be a news outlet, which only confirms concrete updates on the case. There are plenty of options out there if that’s what you’re looking for.
 
Not really the first statement can be the usually response and pretty basic with at the end have we will make a further statement later.
Exactly brief expressing disappointment and stating we will release a full statement in due course when we have reviewed the decision and our options
 
Neither party will be given the decision before very early Monday morning. That’s what I’ve been told anyway. I would tend to believe it as there’s been zero leaks which would’ve come had it been communicated already.
Booooo
 
Look at it the other satisfying way if we are exonerated, the media and lots of journalists will be in their own difficult position. Now thats a nice thought for the weekend.
The issue is when dealing with people with no shame and no integrity is they don’t have the ability to self-reflect and they certainly don’t have the capacity to apologise with sincerity.

Hence why if we win it will barely be reported and when it is it will be in the light of ‘got off on a technicality’ / ‘bribed their way out of it’.

If anyone thinks the scumbag press in this country will hold their hands up and say ‘we’ve been wrong for years! Sorry City, UEFA are ****s and so are we!’ then you’re going to be in for a sad time. They will move the goalposts and will continue to imply wrongdoing on our part.
 
No they find out before the public. Always.
So why do they keep it quiet?
“An award pronounced by the CAS is final and binding on the parties from the moment it is communicated. It may in particular be enforced in accordance with the New York Convention on the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards, which more than 125 countries have signed.”

Not only that but: “A party may, not later than 45 days following the notification of the award, apply to CAS for the interpretation of an award issued in an ordinary or appeals arbitration, if the operative part of the award is unclear, incomplete, ambiguous, if its components are self-contradictory or contrary to the reasons, or if the award contains clerical mistakes or mathematical miscalculations.

When an application for interpretation is filed, the President of the relevant Division shall review whether there are grounds for interpretation. If so, she/he shall submit the request for interpretation to the Panel which rendered the award. Any Panel members who are unable to act at such time shall be replaced in accordance with Article R36. The Panel shall rule on the request within one month following the submission of the request for interpretation to the Panel.“

These dates and timelines are fundamental and all state they apply from when the decision is communicated.
Whatever the result, as I asked at the start, why would you keep it quiet if you knew? City/EUFA ‘win/lose’ but that is overturned because the ‘winner’ spilled the beans before Monday? It makes absolutely no sense unless I’m being a bit denser than usual, which is always possible, especially on a Friday.....
 
Not really the first statement can be the usually response and pretty basic with at the end have we will make a further statement later.

Yes a holding statement is “easy” but there’s still a process to go through to reconcile it against the official verdict if we haven’t seen it beforehand.

If you’d written a statement blind would you want to just put it straight out without first checking it’s still appropriate once you’ve seen the verdict? No comms professional in their right mind would do so.

That’s why reactionary comms is so dangerous and the more time you have the better. Therefore I don’t think CAS would expect a process this important (even if it seems a simple one) to take place in a few hours. It’s inconceivable in my eyes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.