UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
Think it’s more to do with the 200m loss in revenue and possible players leaving and us falling way back into the pack while the scum and the scousers move miles ahead of us for the next 3/5 years.

Champs league is corrupt bag of shit.
Not to mention our rep and shouts of 'cheat', plus our belief in our execs. So much more than a poxy cup at stake.
 
This is an interesting article in the Independent today, basically UEFA appear to be saying their evidence and reason for the ban is based on documentation provided by City, not the hacked emails.


https://www.independent.co.uk/sport...league-ban-appeal-date-cas-uefa-a9611751.html

Hmm, I'm no expert on the subject but that doesn't sound good. So the leaked email's and stuff from der speigel can be cast aside but it's the documents that we as a club have actually provided to UEFA where they've found the evidence to charge us?
 
......Come Monday, if that result is a negative one, he looks like an idiot having said this

He'll look like an idiot because he says he has seen the evidence and believes we'll win ?

Wow, so only idiots get a verdict wrong after considering evidence .... I'm going to bet you have ZERO experience of the workings of any judicial system.
 
Last edited:
This is an interesting article in the Independent today, basically UEFA appear to be saying their evidence and reason for the ban is based on documentation provided by City, not the hacked emails.


https://www.independent.co.uk/sport...league-ban-appeal-date-cas-uefa-a9611751.html

This has always been Tony Evans line and always contrary to what others have said. I've no doubt he's been told that by his source at UEFA but it seems very unlikely that it was not from the leaked material
 
This is an interesting article in the Independent today, basically UEFA appear to be saying their evidence and reason for the ban is based on documentation provided by City, not the hacked emails.


https://www.independent.co.uk/sport...league-ban-appeal-date-cas-uefa-a9611751.html
He wrote most of that article last month! Still going on with the ‘it’ll be a disaster for EUFA if City win’ line. It’s almost like he’s a Liverpool fan continually writing what he hopes to be true. Odd that him and DeLoony work for the same rag.
 
This is an interesting article in the Independent today, basically UEFA appear to be saying their evidence and reason for the ban is based on documentation provided by City, not the hacked emails.


https://www.independent.co.uk/sport...league-ban-appeal-date-cas-uefa-a9611751.html

I've seen this line before, which got me wondering if we'd submitted the same important paperwork on different occasions, and UEFA have seen a glaring discrepancy between the two, seems the only logical reason to me.
 
This has always been Tony Evans line and always contrary to what others have said. I've no doubt he's been told that by his source at UEFA but it seems very unlikely that it was not from the leaked material

Shit a conspiracy theory upon an original conspiracy theory - we are well fucked .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.