Investigate a potential indicator by all means, but I would have to seriously doubt the sense of anyone who felt there was any solid case based upon a comment from someone who isn't generally hailed for his precise, in depth knowledge of economic affairs.Were we getting 67.5M from Etihad back then? I thought that was much later that it went up to that kind of level.
The email will be Pearce (I think) allegedly saying His Highness will have to cover the rest - with all the debate of who that title was referring too that has already been run through.
Perhaps they can`t find any wrong doing by ourselves ?First post in this thread was the 7th March, nearly 16 weeks ago.
Why is it taking so long?
Perhaps they can`t find any wrong doing by ourselves ?
Stronger competition means better football means better entertainment. I don't see how any football fan can possibly be against that.I see posters on here hoping Newcastle can get investment and be successful, I find that very strange. Who gives a shit about any other club doing well?
I would welcome competition from any outside the 'big 6'. Much more fun, provided we finished on top, that is.Stronger competition means better football means better entertainment. I don't see how any football fan can possibly be against that.
Then I would rather see newcastle challenging us for the title than the two redshit teams. I'd like them both in the conference south.
Which paper do you write for?
Sums those ****s upIn the early 30s the rags' (as their own fans called them because they couldn't afford to replace their tatty kit) attendances went down to 3,000.
Nice neighbours City bought them a new kit on one of the many occasions when we helped them out in time of need. And what did we get in return? The fucking clock banner.
Me. It’s all about breaking up the cartel and seeing them struggle and others taking over.Is it the lack or dippers and rags in every sentence that offends you? Everything there is factual, am I supposed to pretend that Utd are consistently in the top 3 wealthiest club's in the world? Am I supposed to know Liverpool's owners from the 1920s through to today?
I've been consistent in what I have said, our owner is 1 in million, the club is the best run in world football at pretty much every level. The problem is you don't make rules for the best practice, you make them to save the reckless from themselves. I see posters on here hoping Newcastle can get investment and be successful, I find that very strange. Who gives a shit about any other club doing well?
Me. It’s all about breaking up the cartel and seeing them struggle and others taking over.
I don’t like Newcastle. They come to our ground every year singing WWYWYWS and always have laughable hair do/fake tan/bleached teeth/skinny jeans types kicking off outside after the game.
But I’d fucking love to see them break into our world and help fuck United Liverpool and Arsenal off.
They tried to monopolise football for themselves. They were part of the five clubs who wanted to split 75% of the TV income between themselves and leave the other 25% for the other 19 teams in the league. Then they were part of the 14 clubs who wanted to monopolise European football for themselves, keeping the same clubs qualifying every year when they opened it up to 3 and 4 league places in certain hand picked leagues and seeded the groups so the same teams always made the knock-out stages, all of them creaming in the money for themselves while the rest of football just faded away.
Fuck them!
It was great when Leicester won the league. When they beat us at our place, we applauded them off the pitch; when they went to Old Trafford after already winning the league the Rags boo’d them off singing “20 times” at them (nowt wrong with a bit of banter but the difference was stark).
Football should never be a closed shop. If it’s a closed shop for too long the sport will die.
So let’s hope Newcastle do get that takeover, Wolves’ owner really is serious about getting CL football, and so on and do on, decade after decade!