UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%

  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%

  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%

  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%
  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
Reported with relish and using terms like "booted out" doesn't do his supposed impartiality any good. At least it was mostly factual but didn't spend much time on the evidence or its provenance. Although he states the period the events refer to is 2015 and mentions that was during our agreement he doesn't mention that we were supposed to be under special supervision at this time by UEFA having our books monitored. The only other gripe I have is he STATES the email alleged other monies comes from ADUG. I wasn't aware any such email said that. There is of course that implication but one City stringently deny.
 
The perfect fumble said:
There are events, snapshots in time worthy of note, some real (like our treble + one) some imagined and some fabricated, some celebrated and some soon forgotten (like our treble + one).
Click to expand...
Soon forgotten, my demented mother who remembers nothing but being a school girl, would remember our city treble (+1) longer than the press
 
Kinkys Left Foot said:
Reported with relish and using terms like "booted out" doesn't do his supposed impartiality any good. At least it was mostly factual but didn't spend much time on the evidence or its provenance. Although he states the period the events refer to is 2015 and mentions that was during our agreement he doesn't mention that we were supposed to be under special supervision at this time by UEFA having our books monitored. The only other gripe I have is he STATES the email alleged other monies comes from ADUG. I wasn't aware any such email said that. There is of course that implication but one City stringently deny.
Click to expand...

Were we getting 67.5M from Etihad back then? I thought that was much later that it went up to that kind of level.

The email will be Pearce (I think) allegedly saying His Highness will have to cover the rest - with all the debate of who that title was referring too that has already been run through.
 
Nobody except really knows what Etihads commitment was at that time so its difficult to tell but if we believe that the reported alleged content of the emails is true but question the context then the amount would be deemed as realistic and commensurate as a deal with our current status at that time.

I was aware of which email the ADUG allegation referred to but have never seen it put in print the allegation that the money was from ADUG. Most other press releases and even comment pieces have avoided the rather contentious issue of who HH is while this piece has no such reservations.
 
Need to ban these links to that shite. Really do. They report shit for clicks and someone posts it here, and we click.

Seriously, start banning some of these publications, City wont do it but Bluemoon can. It might even send a message back to them. Or ban links to individual reporters articles. Crazy that this forum is almost an aggregator for some of this shit. Ban them, and make it known to them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.