Well I'm all for competitiveness. What is the point of football if it's the same clubs challenging all of the time?You don't believe that shite do you?
Someone show him the letter to Scudamore on Arsenal headed paper.
Well I'm all for competitiveness. What is the point of football if it's the same clubs challenging all of the time?You don't believe that shite do you?
Someone show him the letter to Scudamore on Arsenal headed paper.
Hahahaha , the bitters
I'm a United supporter so it wouldn't bother me to be called a rag. But I can see how that must hurt if you really are a genuine City fan.
What does circumvent mean in a non legal sense?City’s statement states allegations of financial irregularities are false... and further imply they conform to all legal procedures. In other words, the club has done nothing illegally regarding its financial reporting. Very different from stating we have not circumvented FFP regs.
United supporter here. I seriously doubt if United are part and parcel of this cowardly conspiracy.Sure and United, Arse, Chelsea, Spurs are behind this petition again. But 12 teams at least thats quite a lot. They all hate us with passion. They really do. Fair play to those who didnt join sure United, Pool CEO's tried to get everyone all 19 of them.
Timing is horrible tho, next few weeks, months exactly the run in of the season, big CL games, crucial PL games and this bad air of potential cheating and getting banned or points deducted in PL will be above the club. Uefa waited long weeks since the first Spiegel articles to come out with the start of investigation right today.
Same with the Pl clubs petition they had time to come up with it they do 9 games before to go with Pool 1 point behind.
I didn`t realise we`d been found guilty,5 hours after the press release ?
How can you take action over an allegation?
You can investigate an allegation, and then take action if needed.
More fake news from the British press
I`m sorry but you are very naive if you think your Club are the bastions of football honesty !!United supporter here. I seriously doubt if United are part and parcel of this cowardly conspiracy.
We have always prided ourselves on welcoming competition and beating the new challengers. Unless of course it may be Woodward who is behind it over the inflation of the transfer market.
But it's just not the United way. Could b Liverpool though, They were fuming when Chelsea starting winning after Abramovic and Mourinho rode into town.
You're talking shite, your club don't welcome competition at all, you might personally, but you're not the club.United supporter here. I seriously doubt if United are part and parcel of this cowardly conspiracy.
We have always prided ourselves on welcoming competition and beating the new challengers. Unless of course it may be Woodward who is behind it over the inflation of the transfer market.
But it's just not the United way. Could b Liverpool though, They were fuming when Chelsea starting winning after Abramovic and Mourinho rode into town.
The reality is that any UEFA process is purely a 'quango' facility rather than being able to enforce the 'law'. If UEFA attempt to enforce any ban, then City will undoubtedly take them to court on the basis that the UEFA decision would have been based on an illegal hack and in any formal court of law, would be entirely inadmisable (spelling?). City make clear on their statement that the emails that have been quoted entirely out of context and irrespective of what those emails might imply what might happen, does not necessarily mean it ended up happening. And UEFA will find it impossible to factually prove anything.
But as UEFA are not a court and therefore will come to their decision based on a bunch of UEFA members sitting around a table and talking shite
Well I'm all for competitiveness. What is the point of football if it's the same clubs challenging all of the time?
The question is wrong pal. I’m not arsed about playing semantics. You can circumvent such obstacles without doing anything illegally, but you know that. Read the club statement again. The crux of it suggests the published accounts meet all legal standards. And I’m sure that’s correct.What does circumvent mean in a non legal sense?
Maybe I'm being gullable, if that's the right word, but Ferguson said over and over again he welcomed new challengers, whether that was Chelsea or yourselves he loved a good battle for supremacy.You may believe that, but the club you support doesn't.