sir baconface
Well-Known Member
Whatever the outcome, we’ve been in a lot fcukin worse places than this over the years.
City statement hints at an additional legal battle
Oh yes, the below passage from our statement was very carefully phrased — take special note of a very curious word the club used that I have highlighted.
As I said earlier to another poster, the gloves are well and truly off now.
“Simply put, this is a case initiated by UEFA, prosecuted by UEFA and judged by UEFA. With this prejudicial process now over, the Club will pursue an impartial judgment as quickly as possible and will therefore, in the first instance, commence proceedings with the Court of Arbitration for Sport at the earliest opportunity.”
See last paragraph...hints ? We are appealing it.
Hint: Self-awareness?RingoLaPoutine @Ringolecul Replying to@MailSport
This is absolutely unbelievable... You can see now the extent on which Man City were protected by pundits and media... And this is just the beginning
Source?City owner has said he will spend £30,000 000 on the Worlds best lawyers to tackle UEFA.
Fighting talk that is.................
Our sponsorship deal was over inflated ? honestly is a 2 year ban worthy of that crime ? They were trying to find anything on us to kick us out and our lawyers be ready to fire
The term financial fair play is a joke.. why cant a club be bought and an owner invest into helping them compete ? seems unjust and corrupt to me.
Puma may pull their sponsorship deal now.
Link?
fab alty v. City derby
drink beer in the stands
Often wondered if there is some stupid UEFA rule that says players must stand still during their daft jingle, if not the players should get into a huddle, do some star jumps, wave to the crowd etc.I think the entire Team should drop their shorts during the Eufa anthem then walk off.
So psg, Utd, Liverpool, Milan, Madrid, and every other fucker in the competition are squeaky clean?