Havent seen this story. Whats it say?They can't deny it if there is as suggested a paper trail,hence no reaction from anyone
Havent seen this story. Whats it say?They can't deny it if there is as suggested a paper trail,hence no reaction from anyone
Same here. I'm not going to throw my hand in just yet.Nope. City are leper’s. Alas, successful lepers and that makes me giggle just that little bit more.
So their case is, a newspaper printed this, look it must be true ????Uefa have recently forwarded CAS everything from the Der Spiegel articles.
They have NOTHING first hand, it's truly unbelievable.
Staggering.
Uefa have recently forwarded CAS everything from the Der Spiegel articles.
They have NOTHING first hand, it's truly unbelievable.
Staggering.
So their case is, a newspaper printed this, look it must be true ????
Havent seen this story. Whats it say?
Uefa have recently forwarded CAS everything from the Der Spiegel articles.
They have NOTHING first hand, it's truly unbelievable.
Staggering.
I'm sure we will be able to do that. And the more O think about it, the more I suspect that us not asking for a suspension of the ban via CAS is a 'who blinks first' tactic. If UEFA don't suspend the ban, we miss out on CL but it's subsequently set aside by CAS, then we sue the arse off them. Their finances don't appear to be that healthy so that could potentially be fatal for them. Even better, they might have to significantly reduce CL prize money, which will hit the ****s Cartel.
If, as we suspect, UEFA's case is (literally) paper thin, then they won't want to risk that happening so they'll hopefully suspend the ban unilaterally & we can then say "Well we didn't ask for that"