UK far right trouble

[bluethrunthru]

Yep, 50 odd posts in over 3 years with the majority on the politics forum.

Sounds like a crank.

just do what I have done and mute him/her/it

 

[threespires]

So which ex fruit loop whos returned under a new username is @KDB Fan ?

Looking at the history it was KDB Fan who posted back in September about losing his job and was asking for ideas. He was thinking of trying to get an engineering apprenticeship I think.

It could just be that sadly he's got time on his hands at the moment and imo too much time on your hands and/or a difficult situation and the internet are a bad combination. Hopefully he's either got something or gets something soon that takes him away from this stuff.

 

[KDB Fan]

It’s pointless because you have no grasp of reality. Nothing I’ve said is false. Nearly everything you’ve said is speculation.
Go and bore someone else.

Your grasp of reality comes from parroting whatever information you get given without applying any critical analysis. The closest thing to a conspiracy theory is that US document from the University Of Georgia that you posted. Utter, unsubstantiated nonsense.

 

[KDB Fan]

Looking at the history it was KDB Fan who posted back in September about losing his job and was asking for ideas. He was thinking of trying to get an engineering apprenticeship I think.

It could just be that sadly he's got time on his hands at the moment and imo too much time on your hands and/or a difficult situation and the internet are a bad combination. Hopefully he's either got something or gets something soon that takes him away from this stuff.

You're right. Definitely too much time on my hands! I'm glad you're making the most of your time though by going through my old posts!

 

[KDB Fan]

Releasing information about the attacker is different if the information is factual. If I say the alleged murderer was black and he was black then that's just a fact although it's questionable whether that information is relevant. Either way journalists report facts, they don't go further to report conjecture, and certainly not report conjecture as truth.

However, what happens if I say the guy was black and then said I'm not surprised because most murders are done by blacks despite this being false? If that prejudice and misinformation was put to a jury then a jury would be inclined to find somebody guilty before the case facts and this is contempt. This is the kind of crap peddled by Robinson and his mob and they want to call it free speech.

Many murders of children happen in the UK but most of them are not done by migrants or Muslims, so why is religion or migration status so relevant to these people if at all?

If the guy who murdered those people in Southport had turned out to be a white 60 year old bloke then would those people still demand the facts? Of course they wouldn't and that tells you all you need to know. None of this is founded in free-speech, journalism or fact-finding, it's founded in the prejudices of a racist lynch mob.

So the grounds on which you want people sent to prison is because they've theorised that the killer is a Muslim and claimed most terror attacks are carried out by Muslims? Wow...chilling! What if both of those things are true? Scary, scary times.

 

[threespires]

You're right. Definitely too much time on my hands! I'm glad you're making the most of your time though by going through my old posts!

You've not posted very much so it took me about 2 mins. Anyway good luck with your job search if it's still ongoing. I'm going out for a walk in the fresh air shortly, you could always do the same!

 

[KDB Fan]

You've not posted very much so it took me about 2 mins. Anyway good luck with your job search if it's still ongoing. I'm going out for a walk in the fresh air shortly, you could always do the same!

I will do mate. I'm gonna go and get some lunch soon and stretch my legs. Enjoy your walk!

 

[Alvin-blue-qhd]

A good place to learn some real English!

 

[M18CTID]

Releasing information about the attacker is different if the information is factual. If I say the alleged murderer was black and he was black then that's just a fact although it's questionable whether that information is relevant. Either way journalists report facts, they don't go further to report conjecture, and certainly not report conjecture as truth.

However, what happens if I say the guy was black and then said I'm not surprised because most murders are done by blacks despite this being false? If that prejudice and misinformation was put to a jury then a jury would be inclined to find somebody guilty before the case facts and this is contempt. This is the kind of crap peddled by Robinson and his mob and they want to call it free speech.

Many murders of children happen in the UK but most of them are not done by migrants or Muslims, so why is religion or migration status so relevant to these people if at all?

If the guy who murdered those people in Southport had turned out to be a white 60 year old bloke then would those people still demand the facts? Of course they wouldn't and that tells you all you need to know. None of this is founded in free-speech, journalism or fact-finding, it's founded in the prejudices of a racist lynch mob.

You put it across far more constructively than I did!

 

[Manchester_lalala]

Another thread that sadly needs locking.

This is a live prosecution and we all tread a fine line between comment and contempt.

The likes of Jenrick and Farage know this too-but are delighted to seize an opportunity to enrage their base.

The tedious attempts to justify violence and thuggery when all it was was racism and ignorance.

The tedious attempts that somehow its a 'cover up' and something to do with the budget. Utter nonsense.

This is a highly complex, and yes emotive, case that relies on evidence not conjecture and speculation.

The best thing is for all concerned to wait until the verdict when all available information is in the public domain.

Ahhh, the old locking of a thread trick when other people have different views to the usual suspects on here.

Why aren’t all opinions allowed to be shared? As far as I can see over the past few hours, no one has over stepped the mark and there’s been decent discussion.