United (A) | Post Match Thread

[east2]

Wow you've turned into a rite muppet.

You should be banned for constantly wumming.

You should be banned for being a boring ****!

 

[OB1]

exactly

It's very clear from photos that, not surprisingly, Ederson is set to deal with a shot from Rashford. There's just no excuse for allowing that goal, inlcuding the current Laws of the Game.

 

[Spanishbob]

Just watched the Brighton v dipper game. Apart from the result which i happily chuckled at it was the way Brighton played. Quick passing, guile and an end product. Reminded me of City not too long ago. What i will say is I think we have now hit our lowest level for now and fully expect us to push on and still with this league.

 

[Rochdale Blue]

“Thought I went a bit early so I didn't run. If I ran for the ball I would have just took it or shot or passed. I thought I was offside so I didn't touch the ball," Rashford said.

"That's all I can do in that situation and then it's up to the referee and linesman. In my opinion I wasn't involved in the play. I felt like it should have stood."

What a complete load of lying bollocks!!!

Before var we would all troop back to the pub after the game and mooan about the ref robbing us out of a result but be optomistic about the next game, now, it seems football authorities the world over have come up with a racket that allows them to produce the results they want. Suppose that game was a title decider and the var officials decided to blatantly ignore their own rules, I wonder how the affected clup and supporters would react?

 

[Rammy Blue]

Apparently Dermot Gallagher has confirmed that VAR did not get involved.

As I just said, isn’t it automatic that VAR inspects every goal?

 

[DenisLawBackHeel74]

Apparently Dermot Gallagher has confirmed that VAR did not get involved.

So the question is, why not?

Linesman flagged, ref overruled …..

If no VAR intervention they need to explain why that was a goal.

 

[lionheart]

Why on earth did Pep not bring on Alvarez & Gundog once we went behind?

 

[OB1]

As I just said, isn’t it automatic that VAR inspects every goal?

Don't think so.

 

[hihosilva]

He was not interfering as its interpreted in the new rules,it was a legitimate goal.

Those of us who are old skool and see offside as offside,and anyone who is on the pitch is classed as interferring,are either gonna have to accept this new bollocks or find a different past time.

Defenders are just gonna have to take it all into account and keep defending until any danger has passed.

It fucking stinks but that is the law.

How can Rashford not be interfering with play when the ball is played towards him & he steps over the ball. He's interfering with the defenders decision on who to pick up.

 

[ShedDweller]

And?

Sorry qot my quoting wrong. I was replying to something that was posted earlier. Too tired and emotional to go and find it ;-)