OccupiedPalestineBlues
Well-Known Member
He started the 2 games badly and wouldn't be near my top gk of the season. He has actually won them some points this season though. So maybe I was wrong to say he has been good, he's been decent in those 4 games even if he did change the tactics for them to start winning. Let's not pretend it was just because of ddg alot of them struggled with those tactics.
He definitely struggles in the play out setting and would never have him for City. Still if I'm basing it off performance so far I would say ddg has had a better start. I'm sure it's close in the average rating they have based it off and no one would of been shocked to see ederson have a higher rating. Based off this season though I can see why he is above ederson who hasn't started good. So maybe it is more down to ederson start than it is ddg as to why he has a higher rating.
I understand that perspective, DDG may have played well in the style of DDG, but IMO (in the scenario portrayed) the team ahead of him would be shackled as it’s a team of players that functions with high possession,playing out from the back and with a high press.
DDG simply doesn’t have the skills required to sit behind a team playing like that so they would either need to sit deep and waste their talent or they’d get battered by balls played over the top into the void between DDG (stuck on his goal line) and their centre backs on the halfway line.
So, in short, DDG may have played well, as the old fashioned shot stopper that he is, but the team described couldn’t function with him in it due to his inescapable shortcomings.