He works for them now in an ambassadorial role....possibly the reason for the Use of USColinBellsjockstrap said:Just on now saying with the signing of Van Persie the balance swings firmly to US.
To be fair though, he admitted City have a "fantastic" squad.
it's not the only reason....big blueballs said:He works for them now in an ambassadorial role....possibly the reason for the Use of USColinBellsjockstrap said:Just on now saying with the signing of Van Persie the balance swings firmly to US.
To be fair though, he admitted City have a "fantastic" squad.
Can't see Vidic and Ferdinand playing regularly and I think they'll sign a left back. Evra was poor last season. I don't think Anderson will play many games either. They're still short of a dominant midfielder.sjk2008 said:I imagine they would line up like this:
---------------de Gea-------------
Valencia--Ferdinand---Vidic----Evra
----------Carrick--Anderson-------
Nani----------Rooney-------Kagawa
----------------RVP----------------
Perhaps the Everton game may come to soon and Welbeck will be over RVP and possibly Young over Nani.
The other question mark is Scholes/Anderson. I know the natural thought would be Scholes but listening to them lot, they're impressed with Anderson in the latter part of pre season and think Scholes may be brought on around the hour mark in some games when the opposition are tiring a little so he can ping crossfield balls.
I'm still sceptical about CM for them but maybe they are trying to adopt a KK approach where it's a case of we'll score more than you.
Yes, the other reason is that he's a c**t.gordondaviesmoustache said:it's not the only reason....big blueballs said:He works for them now in an ambassadorial role....possibly the reason for the Use of USColinBellsjockstrap said:Just on now saying with the signing of Van Persie the balance swings firmly to US.
To be fair though, he admitted City have a "fantastic" squad.