pominoz
Well-Known Member
My only worry of a quick decline, is that the yankee shysters may sell to someone with real money.
Save Dave.
Save Dave.
M18CTID said:paulchapo said:They ain't got 200 million to spend.Even if they have and do isn't that going to break FFP? First they have to attract the players,then pay off the agents and then there is the wage package,whittling the amount of players they can buy right down.
If they DO blow that kind of cash bang goes their myth of building slowly,the right way and bringing the youth players through.I spoke to a Birmingham fan on holiday,a sound guy and i was amazed that even he swallowed that claptrap,it just goes to show you how the media and their hype machine brainwash people.
If they spend it all in one go or spread it over a couple of transfer windows I can't see how they can come close to meeting FFP. Even accounting for the huge amount of cash that club generates and even discounting the repayments on their not inconsiderable debt, I would imagine the maximum they could spend each season is £90-£100 million net. However, the Glazers have never sanctioned anything like that kind of spending when Ferguson was manager so why anyone would think they'd give Moyes twice that is beyond me. Plus, as you say, surely those United fans that have slated City's spending would be dead against spending such vast sums of money. Wouldn't they????
Anthony Kun said:Wheres this 200mil nonsense coming from? I was quite enjoying the peace and quiet on Facebook from my raggy mates - I'm sure they'll pipe up now?
bollocks it is, didn't see either of those clubs spend 70m in transfers with a 140m wage bill in 2011kippaxblue76 said:M18CTID said:paulchapo said:They ain't got 200 million to spend.Even if they have and do isn't that going to break FFP? First they have to attract the players,then pay off the agents and then there is the wage package,whittling the amount of players they can buy right down.
If they DO blow that kind of cash bang goes their myth of building slowly,the right way and bringing the youth players through.I spoke to a Birmingham fan on holiday,a sound guy and i was amazed that even he swallowed that claptrap,it just goes to show you how the media and their hype machine brainwash people.
If they spend it all in one go or spread it over a couple of transfer windows I can't see how they can come close to meeting FFP. Even accounting for the huge amount of cash that club generates and even discounting the repayments on their not inconsiderable debt, I would imagine the maximum they could spend each season is £90-£100 million net. However, the Glazers have never sanctioned anything like that kind of spending when Ferguson was manager so why anyone would think they'd give Moyes twice that is beyond me. Plus, as you say, surely those United fans that have slated City's spending would be dead against spending such vast sums of money. Wouldn't they????
Cannot see that happening tbh, as someone said earlier their net spend over the last 5 years is very similar to Stoke/Villa.
kippaxblue76 said:M18CTID said:paulchapo said:They ain't got 200 million to spend.Even if they have and do isn't that going to break FFP? First they have to attract the players,then pay off the agents and then there is the wage package,whittling the amount of players they can buy right down.
If they DO blow that kind of cash bang goes their myth of building slowly,the right way and bringing the youth players through.I spoke to a Birmingham fan on holiday,a sound guy and i was amazed that even he swallowed that claptrap,it just goes to show you how the media and their hype machine brainwash people.
If they spend it all in one go or spread it over a couple of transfer windows I can't see how they can come close to meeting FFP. Even accounting for the huge amount of cash that club generates and even discounting the repayments on their not inconsiderable debt, I would imagine the maximum they could spend each season is £90-£100 million net. However, the Glazers have never sanctioned anything like that kind of spending when Ferguson was manager so why anyone would think they'd give Moyes twice that is beyond me. Plus, as you say, surely those United fans that have slated City's spending would be dead against spending such vast sums of money. Wouldn't they????
Cannot see that happening tbh, as someone said earlier their net spend over the last 5 years is very similar to Stoke/Villa.