agyeiboateng said:Stoned Rose said:So 60m for a 25 year old midfielder who couldn't make the 30 man Spain squad and has never had a full Spain cap and an 18 year old left back who's had 1 reasonably good season in the prem?
The Herrera signing is going to cause difficulties in fitting everyone in. Central midfield wise they already have Mata, Kagawa, Carrick, Cleverly and Fellaini. Carrick will automatically take 1 of those spots. That leaves 4 players for 1 spot. Good luck with that.
Shaw is a decent player, but fuck me, £30m for a left back?
I could understand that kind of money if he was a striker or attacker and was going to be getting 20+ goals a season but he isn't.
I'm seriously underwhelmed and it looks like their 'warchest' is getting spent on, well. not much.
I'm more than happy to stick with our £12m for Fernando and Sagna.
Sorry but this comment is very poor. The Spanish are loaded with midfielders. Isco would start for many teams in the world and he didnt make the Spanish world cup squad.
Fair enough we are rivals with united so we will make digs at them, but i hate when posters just belittle every player to suit their agenda.
Don't get giddy . We are not world beaters yet .LoveCity said:I can honestly say, hand on heart, we have done much better business for £12m than United have for ca. £60m. The only thing is, we've signed a full-back at the opposite side of his career to Shaw, but it doesn't make up for the £48m difference.
United have become the City of 2008. Clubs know they are desperate and like us back then, United don't have a proper sporting director to work the market so throw insane transfer fees at clubs and wages at players (£160,000/week for Shaw according to the fairly reliable Wayne Veysey).
We were absolutely savaged at the time for trying to build a team to compete, yet look at the journalists on Twitter, the likes of Ian Herbert who sound like giddy young boys in a sweet shop at the prospect of their masters becoming a force again next season.
LoveCity said:I can honestly say, hand on heart, we have done much better business for £12m than United have for ca. £60m. The only thing is, we've signed a full-back at the opposite side of his career to Shaw, but it doesn't make up for the £48m difference.
United have become the City of 2008. Clubs know they are desperate and like us back then, United don't have a proper sporting director to work the market so throw insane transfer fees at clubs and wages at players (£160,000/week for Shaw according to the fairly reliable Wayne Veysey).
We were absolutely savaged at the time for trying to build a team to compete, yet look at the journalists on Twitter, the likes of Ian Herbert who sound like giddy young boys in a sweet shop at the prospect of their masters becoming a force again next season.
Ian Herbert is a cockroach.LoveCity said:I can honestly say, hand on heart, we have done much better business for £12m than United have for ca. £60m. The only thing is, we've signed a full-back at the opposite side of his career to Shaw, but it doesn't make up for the £48m difference.
United have become the City of 2008. Clubs know they are desperate and like us back then, United don't have a proper sporting director to work the market so throw insane transfer fees at clubs and wages at players (£160,000/week for Shaw according to the fairly reliable Wayne Veysey).
We were absolutely savaged at the time for trying to build a team to compete, yet look at the journalists on Twitter, the likes of Ian Herbert who sound like giddy young boys in a sweet shop at the prospect of their masters becoming a force again next season.
gordondaviesmoustache said:Ian Herbert is a cockroach.LoveCity said:I can honestly say, hand on heart, we have done much better business for £12m than United have for ca. £60m. The only thing is, we've signed a full-back at the opposite side of his career to Shaw, but it doesn't make up for the £48m difference.
United have become the City of 2008. Clubs know they are desperate and like us back then, United don't have a proper sporting director to work the market so throw insane transfer fees at clubs and wages at players (£160,000/week for Shaw according to the fairly reliable Wayne Veysey).
We were absolutely savaged at the time for trying to build a team to compete, yet look at the journalists on Twitter, the likes of Ian Herbert who sound like giddy young boys in a sweet shop at the prospect of their masters becoming a force again next season.