United Thread 2015/16

[Matty]

Good luck with that, although you might be waiting a long time. It seems that people on here like digging in the dirt, but don't like it when you point out that their shovels have blood on them. They like it even less when you highlight the futility of this point scoring contest, but hey we all get bored at work.

No, actually, what we don't like is you finding someone else's blood stained shovel, and then trying to hide it in the boot of our car to frame us up.

 

[manimanc]

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2013/jul/30/manchester-city-human-rights-accusations

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...uman-rights-opposition-to-New-York-plans.html

http://mideastsoccer.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/human-rights-violations-raise-spectre.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_the_United_Arab_Emirates

when are the mods going to get rid of this fuckin nerd??
he is the epitome of their fans.
gobshite.
obsessed with city.
never had a season ticket.
he ticks all the boxes.
if he`d come on here having the banter then fair enough but the **** is on OUR forum accusing our owners of being terrorists for want of a better word.
mate you are an absolute fuckin embarrassment to yourself,your pathetic fuckin club and to football fans.
get your last knockings in as I think your shite posts will be coming to an end.

 

[shallyman]

Abu Dhabi's human rights most certainly could be better. What that's got to do with Manchester City is nothing.

You see, and here's the important bit so don't blink, Manchester City are not owned by a country. We are not owned by a government. We are owned by a company, ADUG, set up at the behest of an individual, Sheikh Mansour, who happens to hold roles within Abu Dhabi's government. He's not a dictator, he's not the leader of his country, he will have some say on political matters, but he will have very little influence, or ability, to enact any real change in the region. Trying to smear Manchester City because the country our owner is from has a poor record on certain issues is illogical and offensive. If one of the Glazers became a senator, or congressman, would Manchester United become responsible for Guantanamo Bay?

Manchester City is run by Khaldoon al-Mubarak, the chairman, a senior Abu Dhabi government and business figure, who works principally for Sheikh Mohammed.

 

[Matty]

Manchester City is run by Khaldoon al-Mubarak, the chairman, a senior Abu Dhabi government and business figure, who works principally for Sheikh Mohammed.

So we AREN'T owned by the government. Thanks for clearing that up.

Again, are you trying to claim that a single government employee is both responsible for all the things that have ever happened in his country that are deemed unacceptable, and equally has the power to fix these issues? And that any other venture he is involved in is also responsible for whatever has happened in the country he is from? If so you're not naïve, you're an absolute idiot.

 

[aguero93:20]

Manchester City is run by Khaldoon al-Mubarak, the chairman, a senior Abu Dhabi government and business figure, who works principally for Sheikh Mohammed.

You poor lad, don't you understand the difference between run and owned? Let me straighten that out for you;

We are owned by Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, a minister in Abu Dhabi and member of the ruling family.
Our Chairman is Khaldoon Khalifa Al Mubarak, a UAE businessman with no role in Government.
We are Run by Ferran Soriano ,a Spanish Businessman, with no links to Abu Dhabi.

 

[Blue Hefner]

Manchester City is run by Khaldoon al-Mubarak, the chairman, a senior Abu Dhabi government and business figure, who works principally for Sheikh Mohammed.

Have to Google that did you or do you have a working knowledge of the structure of the Abu Dhabi government? Like I said, he Internet was made for people like you

 

[T_C]

Manchester City is run by Khaldoon al-Mubarak, the chairman, a senior Abu Dhabi government and business figure, who works principally for Sheikh Mohammed.

You've just had your arse slapped over this subject.

 

[Dogtanian]

when are the mods going to get rid of this fuckin nerd??
he is the epitome of their fans.
gobshite.
obsessed with city.
never had a season ticket.
he ticks all the boxes.
if he`d come on here having the banter then fair enough but the **** is on OUR forum accusing our owners of being terrorists for want of a better word.
mate you are an absolute fuckin embarrassment to yourself,your pathetic fuckin club and to football fans.
get your last knockings in as I think your shite posts will be coming to an end.

We can't ban him, I find it funny that he's making a **** of himself.

 

[jacko74]

Just had a quick flick through the football headlines online... ''Wonderkid'' ''New Old Trafford Legend'' ''Teenage sensation'' etc etc

Al referring to this Pereira kid scoring a goal against the mighty Ipswich in the first round of the LC.

Seriously, I know the media have always been up the rags arse, but this season it's just on a whole new level.

 

[Metalartin]

Lol google arguments, who's betting he didn't read a single article that he posted? Skim read or just liked the headlines.

If only Skeeter was here to straighten this lad out: