gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Where did I say he was the greatest footballer of all time? I said there’s an arguable case that he is. There is a clear distinction between the two and CAPITALISING what I’ve said doesn’t alter that in any way. I think you need to improve your comprehension skills, and respond in a calmer way to points you disagree with, rather than lazily calling me ’lazy’, before trying to engage in a debate with myself, as I get very well paid to do this for a living.No they're not, they matter as a player but they're more common to average players than anything Messi does.
Call him highly skilful all you like, it doesn't change the fact that he constantly passes to the opposition these days, has a dogshit first touch, can't dribble. Now, he was better in his prime admittedly. He was passable at these things, but you called him the GREATEST FOOTBALLER OF ALL TIME. There's a massive chasm between being a decent or ok passer or dribbler and being the best of all time, lol.
You can say he remains a highly skilful player all you like, but watch him play and the ball bounces off him as often as it does Lukaku and he looks so stiff and robotic on the ball. I think you're just lazily repeating things because he's considered one of the best players ever so you don't wanna analyse his game properly. He's really not skilful any more at all, and even if he was, he can't lace Messi, pele, Maradona, Zidane's boots in terms of sheer footballing talent outside of goalscoring, so based on the claim you made, it's irrelevant even if he was highly skilful. Being apparently very skilful doesn't make him Maradona, who was a genius and an alien.
Anyway, I’ll bid you good day as I’ve got about 12 hours work to do.
Welcome to Bluemoon.