Protein Junkie
Well-Known Member
And they would still be shiteI see they're warming to the idea of becoming human rights abusing, ffp cheating, title buying cheats.View attachment 63663
And they would still be shiteI see they're warming to the idea of becoming human rights abusing, ffp cheating, title buying cheats.View attachment 63663
So of the last two Sponsorship deals.... The guy who signed the 1st promptly got fired for overpaying & the next company has almost gone under with investors questioning why on earth they paid so much for the rights.
Make great reading in their new glossy marketing brochure to prospective sponsors....
That’s a bog standard pun!They are just pulling your chain.
So of the last two Sponsorship deals.... The guy who signed the 1st promptly got fired for overpaying & the next company has almost gone under with investors questioning why on earth they paid so much for the rights.
Make great reading in their new glossy marketing brochure to prospective sponsors....
It's a great point that hasn't really been covered properly. I wonder how easy it will be for prospective buyers to take a look at the state of the Cayman Island accounts. No one knows what is happening behind the scenes in the Glazer operation and no one in the media has ever asked serious questions about how they operate. It would be a hell of a risk to take on.If anybody was "seriously interested " ( assuming that they are actually up for sale ) and thus carrying out due dilligence on their operations, potential buyers would immediately see the levels of mal-administration and pure incompetence running through the shithole of a club for decades,
Great move by the Glazers in conning the lemmings....................again.
Contrast these two stories. The Telegraph is broadly correct and balanced. The SKY article presents this latest commercial disaster as a positive for United with no mention of the background context. Totally biased coverage from SKY as usual.
Manchester United lose £235m shirt deal after TeamViewer investors slam 'appalling judgment'
While United claims the development is “mutually beneficial” it adds further uncertainty as the Glazer family tries to sell the clubwww.telegraph.co.uk
Manchester United to end front-of-shirt sponsorship deal with TeamViewer
A statement read: United will be taking the opportunity to commence a focused sales process for a new shirt front partner in a normalised market.; TeamViewer will remain on the front of Uniteds shirts until a new sponsor is foundwww.skysports.com
Thing is though, is that all this could reduce their price thus enabling whoever buys them to revamp the squad, stadium, structure etc. We need the price as high as possible so that the cunts are still run on a shoestring.So of the last two Sponsorship deals.... The guy who signed the 1st promptly got fired for overpaying & the next company has almost gone under with investors questioning why on earth they paid so much for the rights.
Make great reading in their new glossy marketing brochure to prospective sponsors....
I recall at the time the deal was announced, our very own @Prestwich_Blue wrote a piece on here questioning the sponsorship and its viability and I replied at the time that this will be the rags "Eidos / First Advice" moment.I agree and even though I know little about their business financal health, I assume they've told the rags they have no money to pay further intallments. How else do they get out of a 5 year contract ?
Like the Chevrolet deal, no journo dares ask the question 'how can they afford to pay that much'
We are the bad guys, yeh right.
Edit: the mail are reporting that the rags are buying back the deal !
It is as bent as they come and the rags are trying to cover it up.