Emm? 2 things?The one thing that differentiates a good business from a failing one is: Ruthlessness and Responsibility.
Emm? 2 things?The one thing that differentiates a good business from a failing one is: Ruthlessness and Responsibility.
I am sure no Bluemooners ever considered the rags even in our darkest days, they were too much fun.They're welcome to him,true fans don't jump ship...Rats on the other hand....
Schteve McLaren loves this postThey could always hand out free umbrellas when it rains,gotta be cheaper than a new roof.;)
Of course not, more likely trying to outline the two things they’re missing dearly. Bad wording on my part.Emm? 2 things?
I think that's a bit of a strange argument tbh.Yes but that depends on what the owners' objectives are. If it's success on the pitch and winning trophies, then they've been an abject failure in the last ten years. But if it's to give them enough cash to maintain their lifestyle then they've done a good enough job.
Nothing has changed, in his word's they're still shit.
I've dropped the PL a line;
"As it is clear that Manchester United fans are planning another protest against not winning any more, and given that the last protest resulted in a key game having to be postponed, can you confirm that the Premier League is taking steps to ensure that, for once, the club is held accountable for the actions of its supporters.
I would recommend a points deduction well publicised in advance so that there is no excuse"
A bit shorter than intended but I'm busy just now. I feel that any concerned football fan should make their feelings known to the PL in advance so we can take the piss if the game is disrupted and they fail to act.
But they have spent more money in transfers and wages than any other club. If they had spent say what Spurs had spent you would have an argument.I agree to an extent mate, but IMO ultimately it's down to the Glazers.
As the owner of a business, you either meddle in the running in the business - in which case failings are on you. Or you appoint people to run it for you, and if they demonstrably can not do a good enough job, then it's also on you for (a) appointing them and (b) not getting rid of them after repeated abject failure.
The Glazers have been - at best - AWOL, and that still means blame ultimately lies with them.
Maybe you’re missing the nuance of my original post, but I’m still not seeing anything remotely resembling a problem.Problem is control. Conte wanted to come. The board didn't like Conte because he wanted control. He has it to a certain extent at Spurs and been somewhat successful. He would have done what he wanted at United but they didn't want him having that amount of power. When I say "they" I mean a certain elder manager as the main General among others. He is certainly part of the huge problem they have.
Is be leading the blockade next Monday night ?