yeah whatever !!
Well-Known Member
Just said on SSN that the minimal stake that uncle Malc wants to sell is the roof at Old Trafford. ;)
Absolutely. Really moving.What a cracking read that Giovanni article is.
Well they have about £24.75 worth of player assetsThese assets, with the obvious exception of the wasteland on which it's built, what would they be?
Or the pasty for that matter, as both Luke Shaw and Mourinho can testify to.Why anybody would pay £5billion for them, knowing the amount of money they will need ? It's not a pot noddle and going to be an instant success, 10 years is needed, then Manchester city would still be improving each year, also Liverpool Chelsea, even Newcastle, that's without taking into account arsenal and spurs,
you need to be a very good club with a foundation built around the future and not the pasted
What a cracking read that Giovanni article is.
Which again, lands the question, if the 2 billion speculated they took out as loan re-payments, were not enough, then how much is that club in debt by?
Again the other fishy aspect was the fact that they were looking for capital injection. Capital injection in a club that size is a fucking huge red-flag.
Couple that with their CEO stating " Next Summer will be much worse".
There's some horrid shit going on there. My only thought is that they are effectively using the club as a front for some very dark, shady unstable business practice.
Is that the same Bury that was a small thriving sea port on Atlantis ?Nope - but it's not enough for me... I genuinely want to see them go the way of Bury
If that last paragraph is true (everything crossed) then there's no way the Glazers will want anybody looking at their books.Which again, lands the question, if the 2 billion speculated they took out as loan re-payments, were not enough, then how much is that club in debt by?
Again the other fishy aspect was the fact that they were looking for capital injection. Capital injection in a club that size is a fucking huge red-flag.
Couple that with their CEO stating " Next Summer will be much worse".
There's some horrid shit going on there. My only thought is that they are effectively using the club as a front for some very dark, shady unstable business practice.
My mistake,really meant Community Service,:-)Have you thought this through?
;-)
These assets, with the obvious exception of the wasteland on which it's built, what would they be?
I’ve always suspected that will he the most likely outcome, esp after what we saw last time. (As if doing that is going to “make it all go away”).It does look like the cowards are aiming to get this game abandoned rather than get given the 4 or 5-0 spanking they will get otherwise. A couple of games in an empty stadium will probably even do the players good. Here's hoping there is a points deduction as well.
MUST Quote "Any prospective new owner or investor has to be committed to the culture, ethos and best traditions of the club."
They are so far up their own arse it is embarrassing. What the fuck is all this culture, ethos shit they're pedalling now? It's up there with the "United way".
A tad optimistic me thinks!Scrap is still quite high, plenty of scaffold steel there.
Get £100m for the playing squad.
Take a seasons TV money & commercial revenue.
Might only cost me £5bn to close them dow.
Save £5bn for even Sheikh Mansour gets bored.
Leaving me with £10bn, no United and owning City.
Just need the £20bn now..
You mean you want them to get Buried?……Nope - but it's not enough for me... I genuinely want to see them go the way of Bury
If that last paragraph is true (everything crossed) then there's no way the Glazers will want anybody looking at their books.
Like I said, if you're generating hundreds of millions in capital year-round, why would you need a partial buy-out / capital injection. Those yanks are some dodgy fuckers. And to think the holier than thou' bacon face facilitated the whole shit, and is still slowly maturing in the board room like a ripe parmegianno.And why they only looking into someone putting in some money for a stake in them..
Like I said, if you're generating hundreds of millions in capital year-round, why would you need a partial buy-out / capital injection. Those yanks are some dodgy fuckers. And to think the holier than though bacon face facilitated the whole shit, and is still slowly maturing in the board room like a ripe parmegianno.
He certainly is, Ratcliffe lives in MonacoI have it on good authority from 2 sources that Ineos are not that great to deal with. Ratcliffe is a hard-nosed businessman. Why would he throw away his hard earned net worth on that basket case?