manimanc
Well-Known Member
He's been at PSG for a year, only played 21 times last season and now they're getting rid.
The Mail talking tripe yet again, oh the shock.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
United Thread | 2024/25
- Thread starter Thaksinssoldier
- Start date
The Mail talking tripe yet again, oh the shock.
like i said in the other thread, if he had a quarter of rodris capabilities then do we really think LUIS ENRIQUE would be getting rid of him.He's been at PSG for a year, only played 21 times last season and now they're getting rid.
The Mail talking tripe yet again, oh the shock.
I'm really struggling to see how a Sterling/Sancho makes sense for anyone involved (and therefore I'm all for it).
Can't see Sancho getting a look in at Chelsea and I dont see how his current salary fits in with Chelsea's new lower wage structure. If he's willing to take a significant drop in salary then surely he'd be better off joining a team where he'll thrive? At this stage of his career he can't afford to be on the fringes of another chaotically run club.
Meanwhile United don't really need Sterling and given he's on £300k a week I don't see how both sides reach an agreement on salary.
Can't see Sancho getting a look in at Chelsea and I dont see how his current salary fits in with Chelsea's new lower wage structure. If he's willing to take a significant drop in salary then surely he'd be better off joining a team where he'll thrive? At this stage of his career he can't afford to be on the fringes of another chaotically run club.
Meanwhile United don't really need Sterling and given he's on £300k a week I don't see how both sides reach an agreement on salary.
Protein Junkie
Well-Known Member
Tbf they are talking about Rhodri, the welsh midfielder who plays for Bangor.The Mail trumping Ugarte as the rags Rodri. Well, the headline asks the question could he be? I’ve not read the article to see if the answer is no
Last edited:
LangleyBlue1970
Well-Known Member
It is a very odd one. Out of the two, Sterling probably has the best chance at making it a positive move. It’s certainly one I doubt anyone saw coming, should it go through.I'm really struggling to see how a Sterling/Sancho makes sense for anyone involved (and therefore I'm all for it).
Can't see Sancho getting a look in at Chelsea and I dont see how his current salary fits in with Chelsea's new lower wage structure. If he's willing to take a significant drop in salary then surely he'd be better off joining a team where he'll thrive? At this stage of his career he can't afford to be on the fringes of another chaotically run club.
Meanwhile United don't really need Sterling and given he's on £300k a week I don't see how both sides reach an agreement on salary.
What it does show though is we know exactly what we are doing.
feedmpenzaandhewillscore
Well-Known Member
I'm really struggling to see how a Sterling/Sancho makes sense for anyone involved (and therefore I'm all for it).
Can't see Sancho getting a look in at Chelsea and I dont see how his current salary fits in with Chelsea's new lower wage structure. If he's willing to take a significant drop in salary then surely he'd be better off joining a team where he'll thrive? At this stage of his career he can't afford to be on the fringes of another chaotically run club.
Meanwhile United don't really need Sterling and given he's on £300k a week I don't see how both sides reach an agreement on salary.
Another scattergun bit of business for the rags, yes it gets Sancho gone but what are they getting? Sterling’s best years were a long time ago inside a Guardiola system, he’s failed to get anywhere near that at Chelsea and won’t get any better at the age he is now. He might get some joy going into space when they are sat in two banks of five in big games that’s about it.
It is a very odd one. Out of the two, Sterling probably has the best chance at making it a positive move. It’s certainly one I doubt anyone saw coming, should it go through.
What it does show though is we know exactly what we are doing.
Totally agree. United will be swapping a square peg on big wages (but only 2 years left on their contract) for another square peg on big wages but lumbered with them for another 3-5 years at 30 years old and with their best years undoubtedly behind them.
manimanc
Well-Known Member
Ex Liverpool and city player playing for the rags?
The mardarses in the stands would self combust with bitterness.
Piss funny two of our rejects are giving the red pricks sleepless nights.
The mardarses in the stands would self combust with bitterness.
Piss funny two of our rejects are giving the red pricks sleepless nights.
Vienna_70
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 41,161
- Location
- 100, 32, 106, +79, 19
- Team supported
- Treble Winners 2022/23.
There’s probably only the Yorkshire clogger, who can beat that: City, dirty Leeds and Littlewoods.Ex Liverpool and city player playing for the rags?
The mardarses in the stands would self combust with bitterness.
Piss funny two of our rejects are giving the red pricks sleepless nights.
dadnlad
Well-Known Member
Hes the one ro suit kick n rush kids footballIt is a very odd one. Out of the two, Sterling probably has the best chance at making it a positive move. It’s certainly one I doubt anyone saw coming, should it go through.
What it does show though is we know exactly what we are doing.