TinFoilHat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2023
- Messages
- 23,702
- Team supported
- Manchester City
I don't like to intrude on private grief.
But those cunts loved that banner so fuck em!
But those cunts loved that banner so fuck em!
How do they have costs of £47.8 million in order for Scruffy Jim to buy 27% of the club?Man United insist they haven't broken FFP or PSR rules after posting £113m loss
Man Utd have released their financial results fo the year ending June 30, 2024 and the club have made a substantial loss despite posting record revenues.www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk
We're fed the narrative from Talkshite,Sly, general media they're the biggest club in the world, more fans across the Globe etc etc etc.
How is it this seemingly worldwide domination isn't impactful on their financial accounts then ?
We know the press will put out whatever bullshit the rags come out with without so a question or a murmur.How do they have costs of £47.8 million in order for Scruffy Jim to buy 27% of the club?
It stinks as much as Liverpool spending around the same on “feasibility studies” for a new ground on Stanley Park.
Scum. They have posted losses of more than £92m for three of the last four years and have now recorded total losses of £372.8m over the previous five years and £257.4m across the last three years, but insist they are sticking by financial rules drawn up by the Premier League and UEFA.
The Premier League's Profit and Sustainability Rules allow for losses of £105m over a three-year period, but United claim they are inside that limit when allowable losses, such as investment in infrastructure, academies and women's football, are taken into account.
£257.4m less £105 allowable losses = £152.4m. Not a cat in hells chance they have invested that much to allow them to pass PSR.
https://www.thebusinessdesk.com/nor...utm_campaign=NorthWest_11th_Sep_2024_Breaking