cleavers
Moderator
He plays for united, so clear and obvious reason to be rescinded.But there‘s obviously no grounds for it to be rescinded.
He plays for united, so clear and obvious reason to be rescinded.But there‘s obviously no grounds for it to be rescinded.
Like fuck we would. Disgrace and a joke combined.Again it shows why VAR is bent and pointless
The match referee gave him a straight red VAR looked at it and agreed it stayed with the referee's choice.
Only for PGMOL to overturn it on appeal, The stench around this lot is why I hate the game,
Do you think City win the appeal if it was Rodri
So many things wrong about this. But still fresh in the memory was that joke of a goal they scored against us a couple of seasons ago so why be surprised by the latest episode.It sure was.
So, if I recall correctly once you have been dismissed you must leave the field of play - in all its guises - the PL since its inception have deemed everything as part of play.
Rat twat surely brings the game into disrepute by questioning the decision?
More to the point and this really has me perplexed - the game is over, he’s left the field an hour before. He’s interviewed ‘live’ after the game still in his scum kit - am I missing something here?
Did they ever?!This is just laughable now.
Rubbing every other PL team's nose in it.
They're now not even trying to hide the favouritism and bias that they give to the rags.
Are they going to pass it on to the argie dwarf for his two footed jump tackle that injured a Palace player ??Didn’t think it was a red at the time, and it should have been rescinded in the pitch. Makes a bit of a mockery of VAR. Not convinced an appeal would’ve been successful if it was a different club, mind you. Not that it really matters. Fernandes is more of a hindrance to United on current form.