TinFoilHat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2023
- Messages
- 38,016
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Apart from the aqueducts...What have the Romans done for us?Aqueducts.
Apart from the aqueducts...What have the Romans done for us?Aqueducts.
Unknown English team play Unknown Romanian team.Don't give them a penny
The commentator on TNT last night referred to them as FCSB and you see it typed on fixtures everywhere. What happened to good old "Steaua Bucharest"?FCSB OK!
Biggus Dickus?Apart from the aqueducts...What have the Romans done for us?
I didn’t even realise it was Steaua, until you told me.The commentator on TNT last night referred to them as FCSB and you see it typed on fixtures everywhere. What happened to good old "Steaua Bucharest"?
I didn’t even realise it was Steaua, until you told me.
It’s pathetic, isn’t it? Shortening everything to a three or four letter abbreviation.
They are in dispute with the Romanian army over who own the rights to the original name. So now there are 2 teams both claiming to be Steaua Bucharest. The army version are in a lower division.The commentator on TNT last night referred to them as FCSB and you see it typed on fixtures everywhere. What happened to good old "Steaua Bucharest"?
Brilliant!wtf !
Why should it matter, after all we've got a team in our league claiming to be from Manchester and no one bats an eyelid.They are in dispute with the Romanian army over who own the rights to the original name. So now there are 2 teams both claiming to be Steaua Bucharest. The army version are in a lower division.
Cheers. I read up on it on by break shortly after my post. It's a shame. Steaua Bucharest is one of the old romantic names in European football. Those cheeky chaps at Anfield like it so much, they take a banner with it on to one match a year.They are in dispute with the Romanian army over who own the rights to the original name. So now there are 2 teams both claiming to be Steaua Bucharest. The army version are in a lower division.
They certainly do but it makes no sense at all.Cheers. I read up on it on by break shortly after my post. It's a shame. Steaua Bucharest is one of the old romantic names in European football. Those cheeky chaps at Anfield like it so much, they take a banner with it on to one match a year.
Winners of The European Cup in 1986.Cheers. I read up on it on by break shortly after my post. It's a shame. Steaua Bucharest is one of the old romantic names in European football. Those cheeky chaps at Anfield like it so much, they take a banner with it on to one match a year.
Really?!?Winners of The European Cup in 1986.
That's completely wild ,I had no idea about this ..They are in dispute with the Romanian army over who own the rights to the original name. So now there are 2 teams both claiming to be Steaua Bucharest. The army version are in a lower division.
All 100 would say YES ? Would they fuck!! Laughable mateI’m pretty sure if you polled 100 voters across the country if the government should spend ~£200m moving a train station to facilitate Ratcliffe spending 10x that amount building a stadium, all 100 of them would say yes.
It’s really bizarre how stupid some posters are being about this. The problem is not the government spending this money, it’s the local government not doing the same to add more tram capacity for the Etihad.

Great goal for us at Wembley.Biggus Dickus?