Blueknows
Well-Known Member
And spent 1.7 BILLION since last winning the leaguethey spent 200 million+ on forward line alone i should hope they have improved
And spent 1.7 BILLION since last winning the leaguethey spent 200 million+ on forward line alone i should hope they have improved
shhhhAnd spent 1.7 BILLION since last winning the league
So, the neck end of their debt could be down to buying players, injecting them with nytid DNA and turning them into shit.And spent 1.7 BILLION since last winning the league
they dont back managers them glazersSo, the neck end of their debt could be down to buying players, injecting them with nytid DNA and turning them into shit.
Excellent.
SCUM.
CTID.
As you were Blues.
There's always the rescue act of a Uefa rule change!City, Arsenal, Liverpool, Chelsea and probably Villa will finish above them. I also expect Newcastle to get thier arse in gear as well
In all likelihood they will finish between 7th and 12th
Highly unlikely they get the CL spot
and years awayThey’re certainly better than they were. But that’s a low bar given they very nearly finished 4th from bottom last year.
How far are they off a genuine title challenge though? Miles away
how many times do Gill and co need to change the rules to help them ? 5th place , europa winners , now talking about a place for history clubs ffsThere's always the rescue act of a Uefa rule change!
That's photoshopped. No way you get that many rags at a parade.Sly spurts spews,,, “ let’s go live to Manchester City Centre”
View attachment 178174
Two very well argued cases, I have to admire the work of Youngbob, but I do feel that Phil1 has the stronger case and indeed utd are wank is the verdictutd are wank.
Like the Duracell bunny buy not as articulate
Amen to thatThis is how bad they have become, that losing but playing half way decent is seen as an upward trend, lets put some perspective on this supposed upward trend, in their last six games they have won 2 of them, one a credible win against palace even tho they were absolutely battered in the 1st half and palace gassed out and against wolves who city under 8s would currently beat, the other games were a 1-0 loss at home to a 10 man everton, a 1-1 draw at home to a bottom three west ham, a 4-4 draw at home to a bournemouth team who hadnt won in the last 6 and who at weekend drew with burnley at home and a 2-1 loss to a villa team who put in their worst performance of the season.
So if this is what constitutes an upward trajectory let it continue.
The pisscan reckons about another 10 years at best.They’re certainly better than they were. But that’s a low bar given they very nearly finished 4th from bottom last year.
How far are they off a genuine title challenge though? Miles away
When i first scrolled down and saw thisSomeone in the rags sponsorship department is missing a trick here.View attachment 178179

RagWe are in a good cycle with Pep. The cycle has lasted 8-9 years, but it is still a cycle all the same.
And, not that I need to justify myself, but I've been a blue since the Gillingham game, a season ticket holder since 2003, and a member of this forum for 16 years (on and off). I've had this "new" account for longer than you've had yours ffs.
As I said before, posting anything vaguely reasonable about United sure does get people wound up.
Meaning clubs who have an entitlement but are now shit. Uefa can see the money rolling in with TV rights, 'cos that's the only way these entitled 'history' fans watch their football.how many times do Gill and co need to change the rules to help them ? 5th place , europa winners , now talking about a place for history clubs ffs