BlueMoonAcrossThePond
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 5,956
- Team supported
- Manchester City
>> Where are your army of arbiters bringing fake news to book?Where are your army of arbiters bringing fake news to book? It isn't going to happen, it just isn't feasible.
From time to time I watch the senate meetings to decide nominees etc for lifetime appointments and the amount of skulduggery on display is astounding, it's pure theatre it's an abomination how the candidates weasel their way out of questions posed to them (This isn't just a US problem it's democracies in general).
Accept we don't really live in a utopian democracy and never will but take the small wins or we will end up living in an autocracy where decisions are rights are removed and decisions made for us.
Really? Are you out of your mind? Just listen to any far Right so-called news outlets. Hell, often Fox "News" engages in this.
Currently this sort of fake reporting is somewhat easy to identify through critical thinking - absent regulation - in about 5-years time - AI will enhance fake posts to the extent that what's true versus what's false is completely unknown.
>> From time to time I watch the senate meetings to decide nominees etc for lifetime appointments and the amount of skulduggery on display is astounding, it's pure theatre it's an abomination how the candidates weasel their way out of questions posed to them (This isn't just a US problem it's democracies in general).
Agree. So, how do you parse truth from falsehood in these debates?
>> Accept we don't really live in a utopian democracy and never will but take the small wins or we will end up living in an autocracy where decisions are rights are removed and decisions made for us.
I'm not for utopia. I'm simply pointing out that if truth is indistinguishable from lies then random decisions will be made. Don't vaccinate. Don't try to curb climate change. And so on. To the detriment of society.