Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Apr 2019
- Messages
- 18,391
- Team supported
- FC Zurich (and city of course)
There is probably another reasonYeah, 4F for no dick.
There is probably another reasonYeah, 4F for no dick.
Bone spurs probably.Yeah, 4F for no dick.
If that's the case, what is he typing with? Don't answer that.Bone spurs probably.
It’s half 11 on a Friday night. The Gruyère bloke is posting with a beer in one hand and a fishing rod in the other.
X-BotGPTIf that's the case, what is he typing with? Don't answer that.
Yes but there’s a difference between funny haha and funny odd.I'd did say I find it funny
There is absolutely no point engaging. It’s a complete waste of your time and emotional energy.Imagine the rabbit hole you have to go down to actually type a sentence like this.
Imagine the cynicism about human beings, the desperate egoism/self-delusion it takes to cling to what you thought was true that's turned out wrong, the amorality to not care about the harm inflicted on others.
It's not even funny anymore. It's not even stupid anymore. It's not even pathetic anymore.
It's simply absolutely disgusting.
I don’t understand why they are bussing in AI images.They’re all being ‘bussed in and paid to be there’ of course…
Yes, a woman posting on social media about a neighbour’s daughter’s friend is a good source, worth sending a whole army of reporters for.Not a single lie was spoken.
Officials saying we have no evidence is t proof it's not happening. Journalist should be going down there to interview people and get to the bottom of the story.
Not parroting the government's stated position. Since when did the news become the government's mouthpiece?
This is where we’re at, I’m afraid.Yes, a woman posting on social media about a neighbour’s daughter’s friend is a good source, worth sending a whole army of reporters for.
Hilary Clinton got over 2.8 million more popular votes but still lost to Donald Trump. Probably a better example of how the above could happen.Not quite the same system, but I guess a similar principle applies.
In 2020, a high turnout year, 66.8% of eligible voters voted, so call that 2/3.
Of the 155.5M votes cast, Biden received 51.3%, while Trump received 46.8%.
Without doing any serious math we can say that Biden, while securing the highest number of votes by any President ever, got “only” a hair over 1/3 and Trump, who got the most votes of any Republican or loser (redundant, I know!) a hair under 1/3 of the eligible votes!