gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Until the Supreme Court engage in more mental gymnastics and say he can.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
US Politics Thread
- Thread starter Ric
- Start date
FogBlueInSanFran
Well-Known Member
Sigh. It’s in the Constitution. It’s crystal clear. Would require an amendment passed by two-thirds of State legislatures after a joint resolution of Congress passed by two-thirds of both the House and Senate.Until the Supreme Court engage in more mental gymnastics and say he can.
Not happening.
Last edited:
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Nice you’ve got such faith in your manifestly robust institutions.Sigh. It’s in the Constitution. Would require an amendment passed by two-thirds of State legislatures after a joint resolution of Congress passed by two-thirds of both the House and Senate.
Not happening.
idahoblues
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Mar 2009
- Messages
- 20,096
Not happeningUntil the Supreme Court engage in more mental gymnastics and say he can.
FogBlueInSanFran
Well-Known Member
No, I just understand them better than you do.Nice you’ve got such faith in your manifestly robust institutions.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Spoken like a true acolyte.No, I just understand them better than you do.
FogBlueInSanFran
Well-Known Member
It’s not a belief — it’s a fact.Spoken like a true acolyte.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
The facts are that your institutions are breaking down. So any expressions of certainty about how they will operate in the future aren’t built on solid ground.It’s not a belief — it’s a fact.
FogBlueInSanFran
Well-Known Member
What in the Constitution has “broken down”? And be specific. Institutions exist separately from the Constitution.The facts are that your institutions are breaking down. So any expressions of certainty about how they will operate in the future aren’t built on solid ground.
I’m also not sure why you’re arguing either, other than you made a flippant comment, I told you the facts, and now you want to defend the silliness of what you originally said.
Alternatively, get the Maga justices in SCOTUS to make something up along the lines of “the 14th Amendment doesn’t count.”Sigh. It’s in the Constitution. It’s crystal clear. Would require an amendment passed by two-thirds of State legislatures after a joint resolution of Congress passed by two-thirds of both the House and Senate.
Not happening.