I have no interest in choosing what happens to a woman's body.What gives you (or any man) the right to choose what happens to a woman’s body?
I have no interest in choosing what happens to a woman's body.What gives you (or any man) the right to choose what happens to a woman’s body?
Ok, why would you have any say on whether a woman has an abortion or not? It’s nothing to do with you.I have no interest in choosing what happens to a woman's body.
How should l know about what a hypothetical 'parent' might do in a hypothetical situation in presumablyDo you think a parent who would have otherwise aborted their child, is more likely to in some way neglect the child when born?
But freely available contraception has already pushed abortion rates down.
It’s a failsafe. Nobody who uses the service, apart from vulnerable people with mental health issues think otherwise.
It’s a traumatic experience and I don't think many women would choose to undergo it for a second time if they could avoid it.
Personally, no. But there is the life of another human being involved in abortion.Ok, why would you have any say on whether a woman has an abortion or not? It’s nothing to do with you.
Not really. The rest of the first world disagrees with that.Personally, no. But there is the life of another human being involved in abortion.
It's the same way I wouldn't have any interest or say in what someone does with their own property. Unless, you know, that property just so happens to be another human being. Then it gets a little dicey.
It's kinda how the Slavery argument thingy played out. Some thought others shouldn't have a right or say on what they did with their property. Others thought, well that's true unless what you call property is another human being.
Now, you'd argue a baby in the womb isn't a person. They'd argue it is and both side would proffer arguments for what makes their position right.
But as you can see, there is an discussion to be had
FFS Bigga... Personal responsibility? You sound like a Right Winger. Are you Riyadh Mahrez?
I appreciate you 'challenging yourself' as you have. But I'll stop short of commending you. As it is EASIER to "challenge" the prevailing viewpoint on the ideological side you belong to when you don't have skin in the game.
Here, the issue is about women and their rights. None of which applies directly to you. It'd be more impressive to see you challenge yourself on issues that directly apply to you... I.e. Leftist stands on Black issues. Now that would be impressive.
But overall, I agree there is a discussion to be had here. Even though some are pretending it's an open and shut case and they are on the side of the angels. I'm not so sure they are Right.