I'm wondering if the ethos of playing the same way throughout the club regardless of which team is hindering us here.
I like this point because it's obvious that the players are being lined up like they are on a white board ... 4-3-3 but, when you compare how they actually play with and without the ball, individually and as a collective, it is painful how
not like our first team or EDS play. They don't progress the ball, or create overloads with switches of play, or create triangles in the final third to release the winger behind in the 18 yard box, or use pretty much any of the positional play and associated pressing of the men's first team.
On that last point, there was a moment in the first half (?) when Esme was turned around telling another player to press when it was obvious that the trigger had already been and gone. A clear sign that the players are being told '
We do Pep ball' without the necessary training on how to actually do Pep ball.
One of Rinus Michel's central tenets, mentioned in one of the Pep books, was '
compact in defense/expansive in attack'. Pep took that a step further by applying that logic to areas of the field when out of possession. What we've seen in attack is wingers completely isolated, having to fend for themselves against multiple defenders because the opposition know we don't seek overloads and in defense, the entire being scythed through because none of the players are anywhere near each other to be able to press effectively.
(More than I planned to write there, sorry blues ;))