I think i have a right to say that, i like that poster want VAR but want it to be improved. i don't think for having that view makes me supportive of killing the game and being a c*nt.
I didn't see the game, but without VAR the penalty would have been given to Man U right ? regardless of it being offside.
How are the officials who operate it getting everything so wrong week after week?
firstly, there's no mention here of how many they get right - there has been hundreds of decisions which the refs would have normally got wrong, but checking VAR they realise player was offside or there was actually a foul.
this all goes very quiet.
however, there are still to many times where officials have checked and still got it wrong - Dean/Mason last week, they have been absolutely slaughtered, and they don't have a excuse of not seeing it again. I think there would have been less uproar without VAR because we got so accustomed to bad decisions.
No system is going to be 100% perfect, i really have to repeat that, otherwise we can all point at decisions and say 'explain that then ?!' and it will go on forever, but just because a system isn't 100% perfect, it can still be a better alternative to before.
I am just as angry as anyone when refs fuck up and more so with the benefit of VAR. refs need better training and more transparency, a lot of good suggestions, ie: refs being miked up. could be a solution.