You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Var debate 2019/20
- Thread starter Chi-town blues
- Start date
Blue Til Death
Well-Known Member
I.always enjoy the football, that's why I go home and away, just expressing my thoughts on VAR is all.... Don't feel sorry for me....Sorry...
I have just checked on Google Maps but I can't locate an "anti football road" anywhere...
If you couldn't enjoy the football on display this afternoon at West Ham I feel sorry for you... really sorry.
JJ
JJ
wagonman
Well-Known Member
I.always enjoy the football, that's why I go home and away, just expressing my thoughts on VAR is all.... Don't feel sorry for me....
JJ
Okey dokey..
I misunderstood what you meant by the "anti football road" you posted about.
Please forgive me.
JJ
Sorry...
I have just checked on Google Maps but I can't locate an "anti football road" anywhere...
If you couldn't enjoy the football on display this afternoon at West Ham I feel sorry for you... really sorry.
JJ
To be honest the first half was so so and the second half was vexing. Seem dead heats given at horse racing when it is that close. Also they sais after the farce at the women's world cup they would not use it for infringements when a penalty is being taken that the officials don't see.
Blue Til Death
Well-Known Member
Forgiven mate... :-)Okey dokey..
I misunderstood what you meant by the "anti football road" you posted about.
Please forgive me.
JJ
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,066
Clear and obvious doesn’t come into it with an offside leading to a goal. Says so in your own post.From PIGMOL,clear and obvious error is not a mm offside
VAR will monitor the matches but will be used only for "clear and obvious errors" or "serious missed incidents" in four match-changing situations:
•Goals
•Penalty decisions
•Direct red card incidents
•Mistaken identity
The final decisions wil be made by the onfield referee
Assistant referees will not flag for tight offside decisions
Factual decisions, such as offside or if a foul was committed inside or outside the penalty area, will not be subject to the "clear and obvious error" test.
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,066
But they aren’t. Every goal is checked for offside and therefore no need for clear and obvious test.That was on their site on wed,they are going against their own rules
cleavers
Moderator
I think that was just the keeper off the line bit, being left to on field officials. The encroachment rule hasn't changed, its just been ignored for years, good if they're going to apply, so long as its consistently done.Also they sais after the farce at the women's world cup they would not use it for infringements when a penalty is being taken that the officials don't see.
Me tooStopping me celebrating now. Think this will be my last year as SC holder, 32 years strong but it’s ruining it for me
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,066
Yeah, it’s something that’s always ignored me.I think that was just the keeper off the line bit, being left to on field officials. The encroachment rule hasn't changed, its just been ignored for years, good if they're going to apply, so long as its consistently done.
That and keepers holding the ball for more than six seconds.